Suppr超能文献

不诱导双链断裂的基因靶向在大麦中效率低下。

Gene Targeting Without DSB Induction Is Inefficient in Barley.

作者信息

Horvath Mihaly, Steinbiss Hans-Henning, Reiss Bernd

机构信息

Plant DNA Recombination Group, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 5;7:1973. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01973. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Double strand-break (DSB) induction allowed efficient gene targeting in barley (), but little is known about efficiencies in its absence. To obtain such data, an assay system based on the () gene was established, a target gene which had been used previously in rice and Expression of recombinases RAD51 and RAD54 had been shown to improve gene targeting in and positive-negative (P-N) selection allows the routine production of targeted mutants without DSB induction in rice. We implemented these approaches in barley and analysed gene targeting with the ALS gene in wild type and RAD51 and RAD54 transgenic lines. In addition, P-N selection was tested. In contrast to the high gene targeting efficiencies obtained in the absence of DSB induction in or rice, not one single gene targeting event was obtained in barley. These data suggest that gene targeting efficiencies are very low in barley and can substantially differ between different plants, even at the same target locus. They also suggest that the amount of labour and time would become unreasonably high to use these methods as a tool in routine applications. This is particularly true since DSB induction offers efficient alternatives. Barley, unlike rice and has a large, complex genome, suggesting that genome size or complexity could be the reason for the low efficiencies. We discuss to what extent transformation methods, genome size or genome complexity could contribute to the striking differences in the gene targeting efficiencies between barley, rice and .

摘要

双链断裂(DSB)诱导可实现大麦中的高效基因打靶(),但在无DSB诱导的情况下其效率知之甚少。为获取此类数据,建立了基于()基因的检测系统,该靶基因先前已在水稻中使用,并且重组酶RAD51和RAD54的表达已被证明可提高()中的基因打靶效率,且正负(P-N)选择可在水稻中无DSB诱导的情况下常规产生靶向突变体。我们在大麦中实施了这些方法,并分析了野生型以及RAD51和RAD54转基因系中ALS基因的基因打靶情况。此外,还测试了P-N选择。与在()或水稻中无DSB诱导时获得的高基因打靶效率相反,在大麦中未获得一个基因打靶事件。这些数据表明,大麦中的基因打靶效率非常低,并且即使在相同的靶位点,不同植物之间的基因打靶效率也可能存在显著差异。它们还表明,将这些方法用作常规应用工具时,所需的人力和时间将变得过高。鉴于DSB诱导提供了有效的替代方法,情况尤其如此。与水稻和()不同,大麦具有庞大而复杂的基因组,这表明基因组大小或复杂性可能是效率低下的原因。我们讨论了转化方法、基因组大小或基因组复杂性在多大程度上可能导致大麦、水稻和()之间基因打靶效率的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd7c/5214849/e47dd646b2ed/fpls-07-01973-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验