1 Heart Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel.
2 Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Sep;7(6):497-503. doi: 10.1177/2048872616687097. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Ischemic time has prognostic importance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Mobile intensive care unit use can reduce components of total ischemic time by appropriate triage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.
Data from the Acute Coronary Survey in Israel registry 2000-2010 were analyzed to evaluate factors associated with mobile intensive care unit use and its impact on total ischemic time and patient outcomes.
The study comprised 5474 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the Acute Coronary Survey in Israel registry, of whom 46% ( n=2538) arrived via mobile intensive care units. There was a significant increase in rates of mobile intensive care unit utilization from 36% in 2000 to over 50% in 2010 ( p<0.001). Independent predictors of mobile intensive care unit use were Killip>1 (odds ratio=1.32, p<0.001), the presence of cardiac arrest (odds ratio=1.44, p=0.02), and a systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg (odds ratio=2.01, p<0.001) at presentation. Patients arriving via mobile intensive care units benefitted from increased rates of primary reperfusion therapy (odds ratio=1.58, p<0.001). Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary reperfusion, those arriving by mobile intensive care unit benefitted from shorter median total ischemic time compared with non-mobile intensive care unit patients (175 (interquartile range 120-262) vs 195 (interquartile range 130-333) min, respectively ( p<0.001)). Upon a multivariate analysis, mobile intensive care unit use was the most important predictor in achieving door-to-balloon time <90 min (odds ratio=2.56, p<0.001) and door-to-needle time <30 min (odds ratio=2.96, p<0.001). One-year mortality rates were 10.7% in both groups (log-rank p-value=0.98), however inverse propensity weight model, adjusted for significant differences between both groups, revealed a significant reduction in one-year mortality in favor of the mobile intensive care unit group (odds ratio=0.79, 95% confidence interval (0.66-0.94), p=0.01).
Among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the utilization of mobile intensive care units is associated with increased rates of primary reperfusion, a reduction in the time interval to reperfusion, and a reduction in one-year adjusted mortality.
在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,缺血时间具有预后意义。移动重症监护单元的使用可以通过对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行适当的分诊来减少总缺血时间的各个组成部分。
对 2000-2010 年以色列急性冠状动脉调查登记处的数据进行分析,以评估与移动重症监护单元使用相关的因素及其对总缺血时间和患者结局的影响。
本研究纳入了以色列急性冠状动脉调查登记处的 5474 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者,其中 46%(n=2538)通过移动重症监护单元到达。从 2000 年的 36%到 2010 年的 50%以上,移动重症监护单元的使用率显著增加(p<0.001)。移动重症监护单元使用的独立预测因素包括 Killip 分级>1(优势比=1.32,p<0.001)、心搏骤停(优势比=1.44,p=0.02)和就诊时收缩压<100mmHg(优势比=2.01,p<0.001)。通过移动重症监护单元到达的患者接受直接再灌注治疗的比例增加(优势比=1.58,p<0.001)。在接受直接再灌注治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,与非移动重症监护单元患者相比,通过移动重症监护单元到达的患者的中位总缺血时间更短(分别为 175(四分位间距 120-262)和 195(四分位间距 130-333)分钟(p<0.001))。在多变量分析中,移动重症监护单元的使用是达到门球时间<90 分钟(优势比=2.56,p<0.001)和门到针时间<30 分钟(优势比=2.96,p<0.001)的最重要预测因素。两组的一年死亡率均为 10.7%(对数秩检验 p 值=0.98),但反向倾向权重模型对两组之间的显著差异进行调整后显示,移动重症监护单元组的一年死亡率显著降低(优势比=0.79,95%置信区间(0.66-0.94),p=0.01)。
在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,移动重症监护单元的使用与直接再灌注治疗率的增加、再灌注时间间隔的缩短以及一年调整死亡率的降低相关。