Suppr超能文献

电子检验结果确认系统对急诊科医生工作流程有何影响?一项混合方法的前后对照观察性研究。

What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians' work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study.

作者信息

Georgiou Andrew, McCaughey Euan J, Tariq Amina, Walter Scott R, Li Julie, Callen Joanne, Paoloni Richard, Runciman William B, Westbrook Johanna I

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of an electronic Results Acknowledgement (eRA) system on emergency physicians' test result management work processes and the time taken to acknowledge microbiology and radiology test results for patients discharged from an Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

The impact of the eRA system was assessed in an Australian ED using: a) semi-structured interviews with senior emergency physicians; and b) a time and motion direct observational study of senior emergency physicians completing test acknowledgment pre and post the implementation of the eRA system.

RESULTS

The eRA system led to changes in the way results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. Although there was a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results in the post period, most types of acknowledgements (other than simple acknowledgements) took less time to complete. The number of acknowledgements where physicians sought additional information from the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) rose from 12% pre to 20% post implementation of eRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that the type of results are unlikely to have changed significantly across the pre and post implementation periods, the increase in the time physicians spent accessing additional clinical information in the post period likely reflects the greater access to clinical information provided by the integrated electronic system. Easier access to clinical information may improve clinical decision making and enhance the quality of patient care. For instance, in situations where a senior clinician, not initially involved in the care process, is required to deal with the follow-up of non-normal results.

摘要

目的

探讨电子结果确认(eRA)系统对急诊医师检验结果管理工作流程的影响,以及急诊部(ED)出院患者确认微生物学和放射学检验结果所需的时间。

方法

在澳大利亚一家急诊部评估eRA系统的影响,采用:a)对资深急诊医师进行半结构化访谈;b)对资深急诊医师在eRA系统实施前后完成检验结果确认进行时间和动作直接观察研究。

结果

eRA系统导致结果和行动的整理、存储、记录和沟通方式发生了变化。尽管实施后确认结果的平均时间有不显著增加,但大多数类型的确认(简单确认除外)完成时间减少。医师从电子病历(EMR)中寻求更多信息的确认数量从实施eRA前的12%升至实施后的20%。

结论

鉴于实施前后结果类型不太可能发生显著变化,实施后医师获取更多临床信息所花费时间的增加可能反映了集成电子系统提供了更多临床信息获取途径。更容易获取临床信息可能改善临床决策并提高患者护理质量。例如,在需要非最初参与护理过程的资深临床医生处理异常结果后续事宜的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验