Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助胸腺切除术:学习曲线及围手术期相关结果

Robotic Thymectomy: Learning Curve and Associated Perioperative Outcomes.

作者信息

Kamel Mohamed K, Rahouma Mohamed, Stiles Brendon M, Nasar Abu, Altorki Nasser K, Port Jeffrey L

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, New York.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jul;27(7):685-690. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0553. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recently, robotic-assisted thymectomy (RAT) has emerged as an alternative to either, an open transsternal approach or to a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach, for both thymic tumors and benign lesions. We have reviewed our early experience with RAT to assess the associated learning curve as well as the short-term perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was reviewed for patients who underwent RAT for all causes in the period 2012-2016. Robotic thymectomy cases were stratified and compared according to the number of cases performed by each surgeon (≤15 versus >15 cases). A propensity score matching was done to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic and transsternal resection of thymomas.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (47 females) with a median age of 52, underwent RAT. The median operative time was 102 min with 5 conversions to an open approach for local invasion (n = 3) or for complete pleural symphysis (n = 2). There were 2 rib fractures and 1 recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Median length of chest tube drainage and length of stay were 1 and 3 days, respectively. Operative time and estimated blood loss plateaued after surgeon's initial 15-20 cases, which may reflect the initial learning curve. A comparison between early and late robotic cases showed that with the growing experience, the operative time becomes shorter (94 versus 107 min, P = .018). Propensity score analysis between robotic and transsternal resection of thymoma (n = 22 in each group) showed no significant differences in operative time (P = .79), intraoperative complications (P = .99), or postoperative complications (P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic thymectomy is feasible and safe, and is associated with comparable perioperative outcomes to the traditional transsternal approach in patients undergoing thymomectomy. An initial learning curve of 15-20 robotic thymectomy cases may be required by the surgeons to adequately perform this relatively novel technique.

摘要

引言

最近,机器人辅助胸腺切除术(RAT)已成为一种替代开胸经胸骨入路或电视辅助胸腔镜入路的方法,可用于治疗胸腺肿瘤和良性病变。我们回顾了我们早期使用RAT的经验,以评估相关的学习曲线以及短期围手术期结果。

方法

对2012年至2016年期间因各种原因接受RAT的患者的前瞻性收集数据库进行了回顾。机器人胸腺切除术病例根据每位外科医生所做的病例数(≤15例与>15例)进行分层和比较。进行倾向评分匹配以比较接受机器人手术和经胸骨切除胸腺瘤患者的围手术期结果。

结果

70例患者(47例女性)接受了RAT,中位年龄为52岁。中位手术时间为102分钟,有5例因局部侵犯(n = 3)或完全胸膜粘连(n = 2)转为开放手术。发生2例肋骨骨折和1例喉返神经麻痹。胸管引流的中位时间和住院时间分别为1天和3天。手术时间和估计失血量在外科医生最初的15至20例病例后趋于平稳,这可能反映了最初的学习曲线。早期和晚期机器人手术病例的比较表明,随着经验的增加,手术时间变短(94分钟对107分钟,P = 0.018)。机器人手术和经胸骨切除胸腺瘤(每组n = 22)之间的倾向评分分析显示手术时间(P = 0.79)、术中并发症(P = 0.99)或术后并发症(P = 0.99)无显著差异。

结论

机器人胸腺切除术是可行且安全的,对于接受胸腺瘤切除术的患者,其围手术期结果与传统经胸骨入路相当。外科医生可能需要15至20例机器人胸腺切除术的初始学习曲线才能充分实施这种相对新颖的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验