Culbert Julie A, McRae Jacqui M, Condé Bruna C, Schmidtke Leigh M, Nicholson Emily L, Smith Paul A, Howell Kate S, Boss Paul K, Wilkinson Kerry L
School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide , Waite Campus, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.
Australian Wine Research Institute , P.O. Box 197, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Feb 22;65(7):1378-1386. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05678. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
The chemical composition (protein, polysaccharide, amino acid, and fatty acid/ethyl ester content), foaming properties, and quality of 50 Australian sparkling white wines, representing the four key production methods, that is, Méthode Traditionelle (n = 20), transfer (n = 10), Charmat (n = 10), and carbonation (n = 10), were studied. Méthode Traditionelle wines were typically rated highest in quality and were higher in alcohol and protein contents, but lower in residual sugar and total phenolics, than other sparkling wines. They also exhibited higher foam volume and stability, which might be attributable to higher protein concentrations. Bottle-fermented Méthode Traditionelle and transfer wines contained greater proportions of yeast-derived mannoproteins, whereas Charmat and carbonated wines were higher in grape-derived rhamnogalacturonans; however, total polysaccharide concentrations were not significantly different between sparkling wine styles. Free amino acids were most abundant in carbonated wines, which likely reflects production via primary fermentation only and/or the inclusion of nontraditional grape varieties. Fatty acids and their esters were not correlated with foaming properties, but octanoic and decanoic acids and their ethyl esters were present in Charmat and carbonated wines at significantly higher concentrations than in bottle-fermented wines and were negatively correlated with quality ratings. Research findings provide industry with a better understanding of the compositional factors driving the style and quality of sparkling white wine.
对50款澳大利亚起泡白葡萄酒的化学成分(蛋白质、多糖、氨基酸和脂肪酸/乙酯含量)、起泡特性及品质进行了研究,这些葡萄酒代表了四种主要生产方法,即传统法(n = 20)、转瓶法(n = 10)、查马特法(n = 10)和加气法(n = 10)。传统法酿造的葡萄酒通常品质评级最高,与其他起泡葡萄酒相比,其酒精和蛋白质含量较高,但残糖和总酚含量较低。它们还表现出更高的泡沫体积和稳定性,这可能归因于更高的蛋白质浓度。瓶内发酵的传统法和转瓶法葡萄酒含有更大比例的酵母衍生甘露糖蛋白,而查马特法和加气法葡萄酒中葡萄衍生的鼠李半乳糖醛酸含量较高;然而,不同起泡葡萄酒风格之间的总多糖浓度没有显著差异。游离氨基酸在加气法葡萄酒中含量最为丰富,这可能反映了仅通过一次发酵生产和/或使用了非传统葡萄品种。脂肪酸及其酯类与起泡特性无关,但辛酸和癸酸及其乙酯在查马特法和加气法葡萄酒中的浓度显著高于瓶内发酵葡萄酒,且与品质评级呈负相关。研究结果使该行业能更好地理解影响起泡白葡萄酒风格和品质的成分因素。