Ricci Paolo, Maggini Elena, Mancuso Ester, Maldur Viorica, Medvedyeva Olena, Ursu Simona Carmen, Pediconi Federica
1 Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, Rome University, Rome, Italy.
2 Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, Rome University, Rome, Italy.
Acta Radiol. 2017 Oct;58(10):1189-1197. doi: 10.1177/0284185116687169. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
Background Breast elastography is a non-invasive and widely accessible method used in the differential diagnostic procedure in addition to B-mode imaging. Purpose To assess the role of elastographic features in the differentiation of breast lesions and to evaluate the importance of depth in the choice of reference fat tissue for the calculation of strain ratio. Material and Methods From January to August 2015, 242 breast lesions were evaluated using elastographic assessment based on qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters (color map, strain ratio, length ratio) as well as elastographic analysis. Histological findings were considered as gold-standard. Results Sensitivity and specificity of B-mode ultrasound imaging were 90% and 60%, respectively. Color map sensitivity was 98% and specificity 46%; strain ratio sensitivity 81% and specificity 70%; length ratio sensitivity 64% and specificity 76%. Combined analysis of these three elastographic features improved the overall diagnostic performance of any of the three parameters alone, yielded sensitivity similar to that of color map (95%) and specificity comparable to strain ratio and length ratio (70%). There was no significant difference in strain ratio obtained from the reference fat tissue at the same depth as the lesion and at a different depth (sensitivity 77% versus 84%; specificity 70% versus 68%; P < 0.001). Conclusion In our experience, elastography can improve ultrasound characterization of the lesion, particularly if elastographic analysis is performed.
乳腺弹性成像作为一种非侵入性且广泛应用的方法,除B超成像外,还用于鉴别诊断过程。
评估弹性成像特征在乳腺病变鉴别中的作用,并评估深度在选择参考脂肪组织计算应变率时的重要性。
2015年1月至8月,对242例乳腺病变进行弹性成像评估,评估基于定性和半定量参数(彩色图、应变率、长度比)以及弹性成像分析。组织学结果被视为金标准。
B超成像的敏感性和特异性分别为90%和60%。彩色图敏感性为98%,特异性为46%;应变率敏感性为81%,特异性为70%;长度比敏感性为64%,特异性为76%。这三种弹性成像特征的联合分析提高了单独使用这三个参数中任何一个的整体诊断性能,敏感性与彩色图相似(95%),特异性与应变率和长度比相当(70%)。从与病变相同深度和不同深度的参考脂肪组织获得的应变率无显著差异(敏感性77%对84%;特异性70%对68%;P<0.001)。
根据我们的经验,弹性成像可改善病变的超声特征,特别是在进行弹性成像分析时。