Lionaki Sophia, Fragoulis George E, Venetsanopoulou Aliki, Vlachoyiannopoulos Panagiotis, Boletis John N, Tzioufas Athanasios G
Department of Nephrology, Laiko Hospital Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Mar-Apr;35 Suppl 103(1):155-164. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
To evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with multi-relapsing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), who received sequentially therapy with cyclophosphamide and rituximab, upon new onset of aggressive vasculitis.
We retrospectively studied patients with multiple-relapsing AAV, who were treated with the standard regimen plus rituximab, given in sequence, upon a major relapse, compared to historical patients, who had been treated with the standard regimen alone in the same setting. The main outcomes of interest were relapse rates and frequency of adverse events.
Of 147 patients with biopsy proven AAV, 35 (23.8%) experienced at least one major relapse, of whom, 14 (9.5%) received the sequential regimen and were compared to 21 (14.3%) historic patients, who had received the standard regimen alone for the same reason. Patients in both groups achieved remission in similar rates, but those treated with the sequential regimen experienced a significant decline in the relapse rate afterwards, compared to their corresponding rate prior to study entry [0.07 episodes of relapse per patient-year (95%CI: 0.03-0.2) vs. 0.38 (95%CI: 0.35-0.60) respectively, (p=0.004)]. The need for cyclophosphamide was significantly decreased in patients in whom cyclophosphamide was followed by rituximab [3.3(0-10.5) grams vs. 14.5 (4-177) grams, (p<0.0001)] but not in controls [17.2(0-108) grams vs. 14.5(0-63) grams, p=0.61].
Our data show that sequential therapy with cyclophosphamide and rituximab, upon a major relapse, in patients with frequently relapsing AAV, is associated with prolonged remission, allowing minimization of the ultimate exposure to cyclophosphamide.
评估多复发的抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(AAV)患者在新发侵袭性血管炎时接受环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗序贯治疗的长期疗效。
我们回顾性研究了多复发AAV患者,这些患者在严重复发时接受了标准方案加利妥昔单抗的序贯治疗,并与在相同情况下仅接受标准方案治疗的历史患者进行比较。主要关注的结果是复发率和不良事件的发生频率。
在147例经活检证实为AAV的患者中,35例(23.8%)经历了至少一次严重复发,其中14例(9.5%)接受了序贯治疗方案,并与21例(14.3%)因相同原因仅接受标准方案治疗的历史患者进行比较。两组患者的缓解率相似,但与研究入组前的相应复发率相比,接受序贯治疗方案的患者随后的复发率显著下降[分别为每位患者每年0.07次复发(95%CI:0.03 - 0.2)和0.38次(95%CI:0.35 - 0.60),(p = 0.004)]。在环磷酰胺后使用利妥昔单抗的患者中,环磷酰胺的使用量显著减少[3.3(0 - 10.5)克对14.5(4 - 177)克,(p < 0.0001)],但在对照组中没有[17.2(0 - 108)克对14.5(0 - 63)克,p = 0.61]。
我们的数据表明,对于频繁复发的AAV患者,在严重复发时采用环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗序贯治疗与延长缓解期相关,可使环磷酰胺的最终暴露量降至最低。