Suppr超能文献

第二代抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和重度抑郁症时的激活和镇静不良反应:绝对风险增加及伤害需治数

Activating and Sedating Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Absolute Risk Increase and Number Needed to Harm.

作者信息

Citrome Leslie

机构信息

From the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;37(2):138-147. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000665.

Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Activating and sedating adverse effects of antipsychotics can be obstacles to their use.

METHODS/PROCEDURES: This study quantified the activating and sedating properties of first-line oral second-generation antipsychotics by examining the rates of adverse reactions as reported in product labeling for the indications of schizophrenia and adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder. Additional data sources included regulatory documents, study synopses, and published study reports. Attributable risk increase and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated for each agent versus placebo.

FINDINGS/RESULTS: Heterogeneity among the different antipsychotics regarding activating or sedating adverse events was observed, with some agents displaying the potential for both activating and sedating properties. For agents indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, predominantly activating medications include lurasidone (NNH, 11 for akathisia vs 20 for somnolence) and cariprazine (NNH, 15 for akathisia vs 65 for somnolence-combined terms). Similarly activating and sedating are risperidone (NNH, 15 for akathisia vs 13 for sedation) and aripiprazole (NNH, 31 for akathisia vs 34 for somnolence). Predominantly sedating are olanzapine, quetiapine immediate and extended release, ziprasidone, asenapine, and iloperidone. Agents that are neither activating nor sedating are paliperidone and brexpiprazole. For major depressive disorder, the overall findings regarding activation and sedation appear similar to those seen with schizophrenia. Data extracted were limited to those available from registrational studies that contributed to the adverse event tables contained in the product labels. Postregistrational comparative studies may yield different outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Differences in tolerability profiles regarding activation and sedation have implications in terms of selecting the optimal antipsychotic for a given individual.

摘要

目的/背景:抗精神病药物的激活和镇静不良反应可能会阻碍其使用。

方法/程序:本研究通过检查产品标签中关于精神分裂症适应症和重度抑郁症辅助治疗所报告的不良反应发生率,对一线口服第二代抗精神病药物的激活和镇静特性进行了量化。其他数据来源包括监管文件、研究摘要和已发表的研究报告。计算了每种药物与安慰剂相比的归因风险增加和伤害所需人数(NNH)。

研究结果

观察到不同抗精神病药物在激活或镇静不良事件方面存在异质性,一些药物同时具有激活和镇静特性。对于用于治疗精神分裂症的药物,主要具有激活作用的药物包括鲁拉西酮(静坐不能的NNH为11,嗜睡的NNH为20)和卡立普嗪(静坐不能的NNH为15,嗜睡合并项的NNH为65)。同样具有激活和镇静作用的是利培酮(静坐不能的NNH为15,镇静的NNH为13)和阿立哌唑(静坐不能的NNH为31,嗜睡的NNH为34)。主要具有镇静作用的是奥氮平、喹硫平速释和缓释剂型、齐拉西酮、阿塞那平以及伊潘立酮。既无激活作用也无镇静作用的药物是帕利哌酮和布雷斯哌唑。对于重度抑郁症,关于激活和镇静的总体研究结果与精神分裂症相似。提取的数据仅限于来自注册研究且有助于产品标签中不良事件表的可用数据。注册后比较研究可能会产生不同结果。

启示/结论:激活和镇静方面耐受性特征的差异对于为特定个体选择最佳抗精神病药物具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验