Suppr超能文献

全髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的诊断进展

Advancements in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Patel Ripal, Alijanipour Pouya, Parvizi Javad

机构信息

Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:654-661. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010654. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication of total joint arthroplasty that is challenging to diagnose. Currently, there is no "gold standard" for definite diagnosis of PJI. A multi-criteria definition has been described for PJI based on microbiology cultures, serum markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial fluid biomarkers, such as leukocyte esterase and histopathology assessment of the periprosthetic tissue. The conventional serum markers are generally nonspecific and can be elevated in inflammatory conditions. Therefore, they cannot be relied on for definite diagnosis of PJI. Hence, with the use of proteomics, synovial fluid biomarkers such as α-defensin, IL-6, and CRP have been proposed as more accurate biomarkers for PJI. Current methods to culture micro-organisms have several limitations, and can be false-negative and false-positive in a considerable number of cases. In an attempt to improve culture sensitivity, diagnostic methods to target biofilms have recently been studied. The understanding of the concept of biofilms has also allowed for the development of novel techniques for PJI diagnosis, such as visualizing biofilms with fluorescent in-situ hybridization and detection of bacteria via DNA microarray. Lastly, the use of amplification-based molecular techniques has provided methods to identify specific species of bacteria that cause culture-negative PJI. While diagnosing PJI is difficult, these advances could be valuable tools for clinicians.

摘要

人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全关节置换术的一种并发症,诊断具有挑战性。目前,对于PJI的明确诊断尚无“金标准”。基于微生物培养、血清标志物(如红细胞沉降率和C反应蛋白(CRP))、滑液生物标志物(如白细胞酯酶)以及人工关节周围组织的组织病理学评估,已描述了一种PJI的多标准定义。传统的血清标志物通常缺乏特异性,在炎症状态下可能会升高。因此,不能依靠它们来明确诊断PJI。因此,随着蛋白质组学的应用,诸如α-防御素、白细胞介素-6和CRP等滑液生物标志物已被提议作为PJI更准确的生物标志物。目前培养微生物的方法存在若干局限性,在相当多的病例中可能出现假阴性和假阳性结果。为了提高培养的敏感性,最近对靶向生物膜的诊断方法进行了研究。对生物膜概念的理解也促进了PJI诊断新技术的开发,如用荧光原位杂交技术可视化生物膜以及通过DNA微阵列检测细菌。最后,基于扩增的分子技术提供了识别导致培养阴性PJI的特定细菌种类的方法。虽然诊断PJI很困难,但这些进展可能成为临床医生的宝贵工具。

相似文献

1
Advancements in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:654-661. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010654. eCollection 2016.
2
What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Alpha-Defensin and Leukocyte Esterase Test in Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1712-1718. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000762.
4
Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Inflammatory Arthritis: Assumption Is the Enemy of True Understanding.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3561-3566. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Synovial Fluid Alpha-Defensin Is an Adjunctive Tool in the Equivocal Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3537-3540. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
The role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(7):275-278. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160019. eCollection 2016 Jul.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alpha-Defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Diseases.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1767-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
10
The Alpha-defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infections Is Not Affected by Prior Antibiotic Administration.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1610-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4726-2.

引用本文的文献

1
5
6
7
Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection.
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Nov 21;4(11):881-888. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0094.R1.
8
Utility of Blood Cell Ratio Combinations for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 19;23:101195. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101195. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis.
Bone Joint Res. 2023 Sep 14;12(9):559-570. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.129.BJR-2022-0432.R1.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;81(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
Leukocyte esterase strip test: matched for musculoskeletal infection society criteria.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 19;96(22):1917-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01591.
6
The alpha defensin-1 biomarker assay can be used to evaluate the potentially infected total joint arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):4006-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3900-7. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
8
Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2591-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2475-y. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
The alpha-defensin test for periprosthetic joint infection outperforms the leukocyte esterase test strip.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):198-203. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3722-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验