Lee Michael S, Nguyen Heajung, Shlofmitz Richard
Division of Interventional Cardiology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 100 Medical Plaza, Suite 630, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Feb;29(2):59-62.
We analyzed the incidence of bradycardia and the safety of patients with severely calcified coronary lesions who underwent orbital atherectomy without the insertion of a temporary pacemaker.
The presence of severely calcified coronary lesions can increase the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention due to the difficulty in advancing and optimally expanding the stent. High-pressure inflations to predilate calcified lesions may cause angiographic complications like perforation and dissection. Suboptimal stent expansion is associated with stent thrombosis and restenosis. Orbital atherectomy safely and effectively modifies calcified plaque to facilitate optimal stent expansion. The incidence of bradycardia in orbital atherectomy is unknown.
Fifty consecutive patients underwent orbital atherectomy from February 2014 to September 2016 at our institution, none of whom underwent insertion of a temporary pacemaker. The final analysis included 47 patients in this retrospective study as 3 patients were excluded because of permanent pacemaker implantation. The primary endpoint was significant bradycardia, defined as bradycardia requiring emergent pacemaker placement or a heart rate <50 bpm at the end of atherectomy.
The primary endpoint occurred in 4% of all patients, all driven by patients who experienced a heart rate decreasing to <50 bpm. The major adverse cardiac and cerebral event rate was 6%, driven by death (2%) and myocardial infarction (4%). No patient experienced target-vessel revascularization, stroke, or stent thrombosis. Angiographic complications included perforation in 2%, slow-flow in 4%, and flow-limiting dissection in 0%.
Significant bradycardia was uncommon during orbital atherectomy. Performing orbital atherectomy without a temporary pacemaker appears to be safe.
我们分析了在未植入临时起搏器的情况下接受轨道旋磨术的严重钙化冠状动脉病变患者的心动过缓发生率及安全性。
严重钙化冠状动脉病变的存在会增加经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性,因为推进和最佳扩张支架存在困难。对钙化病变进行高压预扩张可能会导致血管造影并发症,如穿孔和夹层。支架扩张不理想与支架血栓形成和再狭窄有关。轨道旋磨术能安全有效地改良钙化斑块以促进最佳支架扩张。轨道旋磨术中心动过缓的发生率尚不清楚。
2014年2月至2016年9月,我们机构连续50例患者接受了轨道旋磨术,均未植入临时起搏器。在这项回顾性研究中,最终分析纳入了47例患者,3例因植入永久起搏器被排除。主要终点是严重心动过缓,定义为需要紧急放置起搏器的心动过缓或旋磨术结束时心率<50次/分。
所有患者中主要终点发生率为4%,均由心率降至<50次/分的患者导致。主要不良心脑血管事件发生率为6%,由死亡(2%)和心肌梗死(4%)导致。无患者发生靶血管血运重建、卒中或支架血栓形成。血管造影并发症包括2%的穿孔、4%的慢血流和0%的限流性夹层。
轨道旋磨术中严重心动过缓并不常见。不使用临时起搏器进行轨道旋磨术似乎是安全的。