Henriksson Dorcus Kiwanuka, Ayebare Florence, Waiswa Peter, Peterson Stefan Swartling, Tumushabe Elly K, Fredriksson Mio
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2059-9.
The District Health System was endorsed as the key strategy to achieve 'Health for all' during the WHO organized inter-regional meeting in Harare in 1987. Many expectations were put upon the district health system, including planning. Although planning should be evidence based to prioritize activities, in Uganda it has been described as occurring more by chance than by choice. The role of planning is entrusted to the district health managers with support from the Ministry of Health and other stakeholders, but there is limited knowledge on the district health manager's capacity to carry out evidence-based planning. The aim of this study was to determine the barriers and enablers to evidence-based planning at the district level.
This qualitative study collected data through key informant interviews with district managers from two purposefully selected districts in Uganda that have been implementing evidence-based planning. A deductive process of thematic analysis was used to classify responses within themes.
There were considerable differences between the districts in regard to the barriers and enablers for evidence-based planning. Variations could be attributed to specific contextual and environmental differences such as human resource levels, date of establishment of the district, funding and the sociopolitical environment. The perceived lack of local decision space coupled with the perception that the politicians had all the power while having limited knowledge on evidence-based planning was considered an important barrier.
There is a need to review the mandate of the district managers to make decisions in the planning process and the range of decision space available within the district health system. Given the important role elected officials play in a decentralized system a concerted effort should be made to increase their knowledge on evidence-based planning and the district health system as a whole.
1987年,世界卫生组织在哈拉雷组织召开的区域间会议上,地区卫生系统被认可为实现“全民健康”的关键战略。人们对地区卫生系统寄予了诸多期望,包括规划方面。尽管规划应以证据为基础来确定活动的优先次序,但在乌干达,规划更多地被描述为靠机缘而非选择。规划工作由地区卫生管理人员负责,在卫生部和其他利益相关者的支持下开展,但对于地区卫生管理人员开展循证规划的能力,人们了解有限。本研究的目的是确定地区层面循证规划的障碍和促进因素。
本定性研究通过与乌干达两个经过特意挑选、一直在实施循证规划的地区的管理人员进行关键信息访谈来收集数据。采用主题分析的演绎过程对主题内的回答进行分类。
在循证规划的障碍和促进因素方面,两个地区之间存在相当大的差异。这些差异可归因于特定的背景和环境差异,如人力资源水平、地区成立时间、资金以及社会政治环境。人们认为缺乏当地决策空间,再加上认为政治家拥有所有权力但对循证规划了解有限,这被视为一个重要障碍。
有必要审视地区管理人员在规划过程中做出决策的职责,以及地区卫生系统内可用的决策空间范围。鉴于当选官员在分权系统中发挥的重要作用,应齐心协力增加他们对循证规划以及整个地区卫生系统的了解。