Alluri Ram K, Pannell William, Heckmann Nathanael, Sivasundaram Lakshmanan, Stevanovic Milan, Ghiassi Alidad
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2016 Dec;11(4):469-474. doi: 10.1177/1558944715620794. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
Dog bite injuries to the upper extremity can result in traumatic neurovascular and musculotendinous damage. Currently, there are no clear guidelines dictating which patients may benefit from early operative exploration. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical variables that were predictive of abnormal intraoperative findings in patients who sustained an upper extremity dog bite injury. All patients who presented to a level I trauma center between 2007 and 2015 with an upper extremity dog bite injury who underwent subsequent surgical exploration were retrospectively screened for inclusion in our study. Patients with inadequate documentation or preexisting neurovascular or motor deficits were excluded. Abnormalities on physical exam and injuries encountered during surgical exploration were recorded for each patient. Contingency tables were constructed comparing normal and abnormal nerve, tendon, and vascular physical exam findings with intact or disrupted neurovascular and musculotendinous structures identified during surgical exploration. Between 2007 and 2014, 117 patients sustained a dog bite injury to the upper extremity, of which 39 underwent subsequent surgical exploration and were included in our analysis. Sixty-nine percent of patients with neuropraxia on exam had intraoperative nerve damage. Seventy-seven percent of patients with an abnormal tendon exam had intraoperative musculotendinous damage. One hundred percent of patients with an abnormal vascular physical exam had intraoperative arterial injury. To date, there are no clear guidelines on what clinical criteria indicate the need for operative exploration and possible repair of neurovascular structures in upper extremity dog bite injuries. In our study, nerve, tendon, and vascular abnormalities noted on physical exam were strongly predictive of discovering neurovascular and musculotendinous damage during surgical exploration.
上肢犬咬伤可导致创伤性神经血管和肌腱损伤。目前,尚无明确的指南规定哪些患者可能从早期手术探查中获益。本研究的目的是确定预测上肢犬咬伤患者术中异常发现的临床变量。对2007年至2015年间就诊于一级创伤中心、上肢遭受犬咬伤且随后接受手术探查的所有患者进行回顾性筛选,以纳入我们的研究。记录不完整或已有神经血管或运动功能缺损的患者被排除。记录每位患者的体格检查异常情况和手术探查中发现的损伤。构建列联表,比较正常和异常的神经、肌腱及血管体格检查结果与手术探查中确定的完整或断裂的神经血管和肌腱结构。2007年至2014年间,117例患者上肢遭受犬咬伤,其中39例随后接受手术探查并纳入我们的分析。检查显示有神经失用的患者中有69%术中存在神经损伤。肌腱检查异常的患者中有77%术中存在肌腱损伤。血管体格检查异常的患者中有100%术中存在动脉损伤。迄今为止,尚无明确的指南说明哪些临床标准表明上肢犬咬伤患者需要进行手术探查以及可能修复神经血管结构。在我们的研究中,体格检查中发现的神经、肌腱和血管异常强烈预示着手术探查中会发现神经血管和肌腱损伤。