Suppr超能文献

龟类两性异形的异速生长:体重与体长数据比较

Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in turtles: a comparison of mass and length data.

作者信息

Regis Koy W, Meik Jesse M

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Tarleton State University , Stephenville , TX , United States.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2017 Jan 24;5:e2914. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2914. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The macroevolutionary pattern of Rensch's Rule (positive allometry of sexual size dimorphism) has had mixed support in turtles. Using the largest carapace length dataset and only large-scale body mass dataset assembled for this group, we determine (a) whether turtles conform to Rensch's Rule at the order, suborder, and family levels, and (b) whether inferences regarding allometry of sexual size dimorphism differ based on choice of body size metric used for analyses.

METHODS

We compiled databases of mean body mass and carapace length for males and females for as many populations and species of turtles as possible. We then determined scaling relationships between males and females for average body mass and straight carapace length using traditional and phylogenetic comparative methods. We also used regression analyses to evalutate sex-specific differences in the variance explained by carapace length on body mass.

RESULTS

Using traditional (non-phylogenetic) analyses, body mass supports Rensch's Rule, whereas straight carapace length supports isometry. Using phylogenetic independent contrasts, both body mass and straight carapace length support Rensch's Rule with strong congruence between metrics. At the family level, support for Rensch's Rule is more frequent when mass is used and in phylogenetic comparative analyses. Turtles do not differ in slopes of sex-specific mass-to-length regressions and more variance in body size within each sex is explained by mass than by carapace length.

DISCUSSION

Turtles display Rensch's Rule overall and within families of Cryptodires, but not within Pleurodire families. Mass and length are strongly congruent with respect to Rensch's Rule across turtles, and discrepancies are observed mostly at the family level (the level where Rensch's Rule is most often evaluated). At macroevolutionary scales, the purported advantages of length measurements over weight are not supported in turtles.

摘要

背景

伦施法则(两性体型差异的正向异速生长)的宏观进化模式在龟类中得到的支持不一。利用为此类群收集的最大背甲长度数据集和唯一的大规模体重数据集,我们确定:(a)龟类在目、亚目和科水平上是否符合伦施法则;(b)关于两性体型差异异速生长的推断是否因分析中所使用的体型指标选择而异。

方法

我们尽可能多地收集了龟类许多种群和物种的雄性和雌性平均体重及背甲长度的数据库。然后,我们使用传统和系统发育比较方法确定了雄性和雌性在平均体重和直线背甲长度之间的比例关系。我们还使用回归分析来评估背甲长度对体重所解释的方差中的性别特异性差异。

结果

使用传统(非系统发育)分析时,体重支持伦施法则,而直线背甲长度支持等速生长。使用系统发育独立对比时,体重和直线背甲长度均支持伦施法则,且指标之间具有很强的一致性。在科级水平上,使用体重时以及在系统发育比较分析中,对伦施法则的支持更为常见。龟类在性别特异性体重与长度回归的斜率上没有差异,并且每个性别内体型的更多方差是由体重而非背甲长度解释的。

讨论

龟类总体上以及在侧颈龟科各科中表现出伦施法则,但在侧颈龟亚目各科中则不然。在整个龟类中,体重和长度在伦施法则方面高度一致,差异主要出现在科级水平(伦施法则最常被评估的水平)。在宏观进化尺度上,龟类并不支持长度测量相对于重量的所谓优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验