Kim Hae Jin, Kim Sung Mok, Choi Jin-Ho, Choe Yeon Hyeon
Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Heart Vascular and Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jun;33(6):937-946. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1078-2. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
The purpose of our study was to investigate the impact of temporal uniformity and adjustment by the contrast opacification enhancement in the aorta on the performance of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) for obstructive coronary artery disease. A total of 274 coronary arteries from 94 patients who underwent both multi- and single-beat scan using 128-slice scanner at the same time were enrolled. TAG and corrected coronary opacification (CCO) of both scan technique were compared against obstructive coronary arteries defined by diameter stenosis ≥50%. In per-vessel analysis, both TAG and CCO were slight but significantly different between multi- and single-beat scan in overall (-13.3 vs. -14.3 HU/10 mm; 0.31 vs. 0.38; p < 0.05, all). However, the difference was evident only in right coronary artery (p < 0.05) but not in left coronary arteries (p = NS). Correlation coefficient value are more than 0.8 for all coronary arteries (0.84) and each of the three vessels (RCA: 0.87, LAD: 0.84, LCX: 0.81) in TAG in single-beat versus multi-beat scans (p < 0.0001). Radiation exposure was significantly lower in single-beat scan compared to multi-beat scan (0.9 vs. 3.7 mSv, p < 0.001). TAGs of multi- and single beat scans well correlated each other in all coronary arteries and were not affected by temporal non-uniformity.
我们研究的目的是探讨主动脉对比剂强化的时间均匀性和调整对经腔衰减梯度(TAG)评估阻塞性冠状动脉疾病性能的影响。共纳入了94例患者的274支冠状动脉,这些患者同时使用128层扫描仪进行了多节拍和单节拍扫描。将两种扫描技术的TAG和校正后的冠状动脉强化(CCO)与直径狭窄≥50%定义的阻塞性冠状动脉进行比较。在每支血管分析中,多节拍和单节拍扫描之间的TAG和CCO在总体上均有轻微但显著差异(-13.3 vs. -14.3 HU/10 mm;0.31 vs. 0.38;p<0.05,均如此)。然而,差异仅在右冠状动脉中明显(p<0.05),而在左冠状动脉中不明显(p=无显著性差异)。单节拍与多节拍扫描中,所有冠状动脉(0.84)以及三支血管中的每一支(右冠状动脉:0.87,左前降支:0.84,左旋支:0.81)的TAG相关系数值均大于0.8(p<0.0001)。与多节拍扫描相比,单节拍扫描的辐射暴露显著更低(0.9 vs. 3.7 mSv,p<0.001)。多节拍和单节拍扫描的TAG在所有冠状动脉中彼此相关性良好,且不受时间不均匀性的影响。