Suppr超能文献

[胸部肿瘤学中的PD1/PD-L1免疫组织化学:我们目前的进展如何?]

[PD1/PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in thoracic oncology: Where are we?].

作者信息

Hofman Paul, Ilié Marius, Lassalle Sandra, Long Elodie, Bence Coraline, Butori Catherine, Hofman Véronique

机构信息

Laboratoire de pathologie clinique et expérimentale, hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, 30, avenue de la Voie-Romaine, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France; Biobanque (BB-0033-00025), hôpital Pasteur, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France; FHU OncoAge, université Nice-Côte-d'Azur, CHU de Nice, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France.

Laboratoire de pathologie clinique et expérimentale, hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, 30, avenue de la Voie-Romaine, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France; Biobanque (BB-0033-00025), hôpital Pasteur, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France; FHU OncoAge, université Nice-Côte-d'Azur, CHU de Nice, 06001 Nice cedex 01, France.

出版信息

Ann Pathol. 2017 Feb;37(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Abstract

The assays for the assessment of the PD-L1 status by immunohistochemistry are available in clinical studies in thoracic oncology to predict response to immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. With the arrival of this new class of molecules in second line and very soon in first line of treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, these tests will certainly be required in routine once these new drugs will be granted marketing authorization. The rapid introduction of these "companion" or "complementary" tests seems essential to select patients to benefit from these effective but also expensive and sometimes toxic therapies. Although challenged by some oncologists (as some patients not expressing PD-L1 may sometimes respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade), the anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemically approach seems inevitable in 2017. This new activity developed in the pathology laboratories raises several questions: which anti-PD-L1 clone should be used? On which device? What threshold of positivity should be considered? Should PD-L1 expression be assessed on tumor cells as well as on the immune cells? What controls should be used? Comparative studies are underway or have been already implemented in order to answer some of these questions. This review addresses the different evaluation criteria for immunohistochemistry using the main anti-PD-L1 antibodies used to date as well the recently published studies using these antibodies in thoracic oncology.

摘要

通过免疫组织化学评估程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)状态的检测方法已应用于胸部肿瘤学的临床研究,以预测针对程序性死亡受体 1(PD-1)/PD-L1 通路的免疫疗法的疗效。随着这类新型分子用于晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗,并且很快将用于一线治疗,一旦这些新药获得上市许可,这些检测在常规临床中肯定会成为必需。快速引入这些“伴随”或“补充”检测对于选择能从这些有效但昂贵且有时有毒性的疗法中获益的患者似乎至关重要。尽管受到一些肿瘤学家的质疑(因为一些不表达 PD-L1 的患者有时可能对 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断治疗有反应),但在 2017 年,免疫组织化学检测 PD-L1 的方法似乎不可避免。病理实验室开展的这项新业务引发了几个问题:应该使用哪种抗 PD-L1 克隆抗体?在何种设备上进行检测?应考虑何种阳性阈值?PD-L1 表达是否应在肿瘤细胞以及免疫细胞上进行评估?应该使用哪些对照?正在进行或已经开展了比较研究以回答其中一些问题。本综述讨论了使用迄今主要的抗 PD-L1 抗体进行免疫组织化学的不同评估标准,以及最近在胸部肿瘤学中使用这些抗体发表的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验