Suppr超能文献

钯眼脉络膜黑色素瘤敷贴器近距离放射治疗与伽玛刀放射外科治疗的剂量学和放射生物学比较

Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of Pd COMS plaque brachytherapy and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for choroidal melanoma.

作者信息

Gorovets Daniel, Gagne Nolan L, Melhus Christopher S

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Brachytherapy. 2017 Mar-Apr;16(2):433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Plaque brachytherapy (BT) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) are highly conformal treatment options for choroidal melanoma. This study objectively compares physical dose and biologically effective dose (BED) distributions for these two modalities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumor and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose distributions from a CT-defined reference right eye were compared between Pd COMS (Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group) plaques delivering 70 Gy (plaque heterogeneity corrected) over 120 h to the tumor apex and GKRS plans delivering 22 Gy to the 40% isodose line for a representative sample of clinically relevant choroidal melanoma locations and sizes. Tumor and OAR biologically effective dose-volume histograms were generated using consensus radiobiologic parameters and modality-specific BED equations.

RESULTS

Published institutional prescriptive practices generally lead to larger tumor and OAR physical doses from COMS BT vs. GKRS. Radiobiologic dose conversions, however, revealed variable BEDs. Medium and large tumors receive >1.3 times higher BEDs with COMS BT vs. GKRS. OAR BEDs have even greater dependence on tumor size, location, and treatment modality. For example, COMS BT maximum BEDs to the optic nerve are lower than from GKRS for large anterior and all posterior tumors but are higher for anterior small and medium tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

BT and GKRS for choroidal melanoma have different physical dose and BED distributions with potentially unique clinical consequences. Using published institutional prescriptive practices, neither modality is uniformly favored, although COMS BT delivers higher physical doses and BEDs to tumors. These results suggest that lowering the physical prescription dose for COMS BT to more closely match the BED of GKRS might maintain equivalent tumor control with less potential morbidity.

摘要

目的

斑块近距离放射治疗(BT)和伽玛刀放射外科治疗(GKRS)是脉络膜黑色素瘤的高度适形治疗选择。本研究客观比较了这两种治疗方式的物理剂量和生物有效剂量(BED)分布。

方法和材料

对于临床相关脉络膜黑色素瘤位置和大小的代表性样本,比较了CT定义的参考右眼的肿瘤和危及器官(OAR)剂量分布,其中Pd COMS(协作性眼黑色素瘤研究组)斑块在120小时内向肿瘤顶点输送70 Gy(校正斑块异质性),而GKRS计划向40%等剂量线输送22 Gy。使用共识放射生物学参数和特定治疗方式的BED方程生成肿瘤和OAR生物有效剂量体积直方图。

结果

已发表的机构规定性做法通常导致COMS BT与GKRS相比,肿瘤和OAR的物理剂量更大。然而,放射生物学剂量转换显示BED存在差异。与GKRS相比,中大型肿瘤接受的COMS BT的BED高出>1.3倍。OAR的BED对肿瘤大小、位置和治疗方式的依赖性更大。例如,对于大型前部和所有后部肿瘤,COMS BT对视神经的最大BED低于GKRS,但对于前部中小型肿瘤则更高。

结论

脉络膜黑色素瘤的BT和GKRS具有不同的物理剂量和BED分布,可能产生独特的临床后果。使用已发表的机构规定性做法,两种治疗方式都没有得到一致青睐,尽管COMS BT向肿瘤输送更高的物理剂量和BED。这些结果表明,降低COMS BT的物理处方剂量以更接近地匹配GKRS的BED可能在保持等效肿瘤控制的同时降低潜在的发病率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验