Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):925-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.052. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
Topical immunomodulators (TI)-including corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and vitamin D analogues-are commonly prescribed in multiple specialties, but cost comparisons are lacking.
To evaluate differences in costs of TI across specialties and determine associated variables.
A cross-sectional study was performed using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2008 and 2010 Prescription Drug Public Use Profiles, which contain 100% of drug claims made by Medicare beneficiaries.
Branded drugs cost an average of $174.02 more than generics per 30-day supply (P < .001). Differences in health insurance benefit phase, drug choice, brand name, and coverage type were the greatest determinants of patient cost (P < .001). Prescriptions for low-, medium-, and high-potency TI from specialists (mostly dermatologists) cost more than those from family medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry/neurology physicians; total costs of a 30-day supply from a specialist differed from family and internal medicine physicians by $7.36-$14.57, and patient costs were higher for specialists by $1.69-$3.16 (P < .01). Brand names were prescribed 8% of the time by specialists and 1.4%-3.1% by nonspecialists.
We were unable to adjust for some confounders of cost, such as medication weight or treated body area, and the data does not reflect previous treatment failures or use by non-Medicare patients.
The costs of TIs prescribed by specialists (primarily dermatologists) are higher than those prescribed by primary care physicians and could be reduced by choosing more generics within the respective potency classes.
局部免疫调节剂(TI)-包括皮质类固醇、钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂和维生素 D 类似物-在多个专业中广泛应用,但缺乏成本比较。
评估不同专业 TI 的成本差异,并确定相关变量。
使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 2008 年和 2010 年处方药物公共使用档案进行横断面研究,其中包含了 Medicare 受益人的 100%药物索赔。
品牌药物每 30 天供应的平均成本比仿制药高出 174.02 美元(P < 0.001)。医疗保险福利阶段、药物选择、品牌名称和保险类型的差异是患者成本的最大决定因素(P < 0.001)。专科医生(主要是皮肤科医生)开出的低、中、高浓度 TI 处方比家庭医学、内科和精神病学/神经病学医生开出的处方费用更高;专科医生开出的 30 天供应总费用比家庭医生和内科医生高 7.36-14.57 美元,患者费用高出 1.69-3.16 美元(P < 0.01)。品牌名称由专科医生开出的比例为 8%,而非专科医生开出的比例为 1.4%-3.1%。
我们无法调整成本的一些混杂因素,如药物重量或治疗区域,并且数据不反映以前的治疗失败或非 Medicare 患者的使用情况。
专科医生(主要是皮肤科医生)开出的 TI 成本高于初级保健医生开出的成本,通过在各自的效力类别中选择更多的仿制药,可以降低成本。