Young Ezekiel E, Friedlander Daniel, Lue Kathy, Anele Uzoma A, Khurgin Jacob L, Bivalacqua Trinity J, Burnett Arthur L, Redett Richard J, Gearhart John P
Department of Urology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY.
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Urology. 2017 Jun;104:204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
To provide sexual function and quality of life outcomes in patients with severe penile deficiency who underwent radial forearm flap phalloplasty with and without penile prosthesis implantation.
Patients with history of severe penile deficiency who underwent microsurgical radial forearm flap phalloplasty with and without penile prosthesis implantation between 2007 and 2014 were identified. They completed a set of web-based validated questionnaires including the International Index of Erectile Function, the Pediatric Penile Perception Score, the Sexual Quality of Life for Men, and several items addressing general quality of life. Outcomes were compared between groups.
Nine of the 12 identified patients who had prosthesis after phalloplasty and 4 out of the 7 phalloplasty-only patients completed the survey, resulting in an overall response rate of 68%. Among the phalloplasty-prosthesis patients, 66% reported current sexual activity and 78% reported regular masturbation, whereas 1 of the 4 phalloplasty-only patients reported both. Prosthesis patients scored notably higher in all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function except for sexual desire. In contrast, they demonstrated similar scores of penile perception, as well as general and sexual quality of life.
Among patients who have undergone flap phalloplasty, the subsequent placement of penile prosthesis appears to effectively allow for both intercourse and masturbation, resulting in measurable improvements in orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall sexual satisfaction. Despite these important benefits, prosthesis placement does not appear to result in improvements in penile perception scores, or general or sexual quality of life.
提供严重阴茎缺损患者在接受或未接受阴茎假体植入的桡侧前臂皮瓣阴茎成形术后的性功能和生活质量结果。
确定2007年至2014年间接受显微外科桡侧前臂皮瓣阴茎成形术且接受或未接受阴茎假体植入的严重阴茎缺损病史患者。他们完成了一套基于网络的经过验证的问卷,包括国际勃起功能指数、小儿阴茎感知评分、男性性生活质量以及几项涉及总体生活质量的项目。对两组结果进行比较。
12例阴茎成形术后植入假体的患者中有9例以及7例仅接受阴茎成形术的患者中有4例完成了调查,总体回复率为68%。在阴茎成形术加假体植入的患者中,66%报告目前有性活动,78%报告定期手淫,而4例仅接受阴茎成形术的患者中有1例同时报告了这两项。除性欲外,假体植入患者在国际勃起功能指数的所有领域得分均显著更高。相比之下,他们在阴茎感知以及总体和性生活质量方面的得分相似。
在接受皮瓣阴茎成形术的患者中,随后植入阴茎假体似乎能有效实现性交和手淫,在性高潮功能、性交满意度和总体性满意度方面有可测量的改善。尽管有这些重要益处,但假体植入似乎并未导致阴茎感知评分或总体或性生活质量的改善。