Tabatabaei-Malazy Ozra, Salari Pooneh, Khashayar Patricia, Larijani Bagher
Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Fifth floor, Dr.Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Ave, Tehran, 14114, Iran.
Daru. 2017 Feb 7;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40199-017-0167-z.
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing both in developed and developing countries. Due to rapid growth in the burden and cost of osteoporosis, worldwide, it seems reasonable to focus on the reduction of fractures as the main goal of treatment. Although, efficient pharmacological agents are available for the treatment of osteoporosis, there still remains a need to more specific drugs with less adverse effects. MAIN BODY: This review article provides a brief update on the pathogenesis, presenting current pharmacological products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Europe, and also newer therapeutic agents to treat osteoporosis according to the clinical trial data available at PubMed, UpToDate, International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), and clinical practice guidelines. As well, the effect of combination therapy and recommendations for future research will be further discussed. SHORT CONCLUSION: The use of current antiresorptive and anabolic agents alone or in combinations for the treatment of osteoporosis entails several limitations. Mainly, their efficacy on non-vertebral fracture reduction is lower than that observed on vertebral fracture. In addition, they have potential adverse events on long time usage. Development of newer agents such as cathepsin k inhibitor and strontium ranelate not only have increased the available options for treating osteoporosis, but also have opened doors of opportunity to improvements in the effective treatment. However, the high cost of new agents have restricted their usage in selective patients who are at high risk of fracture or whom failed response to first line treatment options. Thus, personalized medicine should be considered for future evaluation of genetic risk score and also for environmental exposure assessment. In addition to permanent attention to early diagnosis of osteoporosis and understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis for novel approach in drug discovery, there seems a need to more well-designed clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer duration on current as well as on newer agents. Also, continuous research on plant-derived components as the source of discovering new agents, and conducting more clinical trials with combination of two or more synthetic drugs, plants, or drug-plant for the treatment of osteoporosis are recommended. Summary of treatment modalities for osteoporosis.
背景:骨质疏松症在发达国家和发展中国家的患病率都在上升。由于全球骨质疏松症的负担和成本迅速增加,将减少骨折作为治疗的主要目标似乎是合理的。尽管有有效的药物可用于治疗骨质疏松症,但仍需要更具特异性且副作用更少的药物。 正文:本文综述简要介绍了骨质疏松症的发病机制,介绍了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)或欧洲批准的当前药物产品,以及根据PubMed、UpToDate、国际骨质疏松症基金会(IOF)上的临床试验数据和临床实践指南用于治疗骨质疏松症的新型治疗药物。此外,还将进一步讨论联合治疗的效果以及对未来研究的建议。 简短结论:目前单独或联合使用抗吸收和促合成药物治疗骨质疏松症存在一些局限性。主要是它们对减少非椎体骨折的疗效低于对椎体骨折的疗效。此外,长期使用会有潜在的不良事件。组织蛋白酶K抑制剂和雷奈酸锶等新型药物的开发不仅增加了治疗骨质疏松症的可用选择,也为有效治疗的改进打开了机会之门。然而,新药的高成本限制了它们在骨折高危或对一线治疗方案无反应的特定患者中的使用。因此,未来应考虑个性化医疗,评估遗传风险评分以及环境暴露情况。除了始终关注骨质疏松症的早期诊断和了解其病理生理学以采用新的药物发现方法外,似乎还需要针对现有药物和新药进行更多设计良好、样本量更大、持续时间更长的临床试验。此外,建议继续研究植物来源成分以发现新药,并进行更多关于两种或更多种合成药物、植物或药物 - 植物联合治疗骨质疏松症的临床试验。骨质疏松症治疗方式总结。
Daru. 2017-2-7
Panminerva Med. 2014-6
Br Med Bull. 2016-9
Treat Endocrinol. 2006
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014-5
Orthop Res Rev. 2025-1-23
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024-7-25
Biomedicines. 2024-7-23
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2024-4-27
Front Pharmacol. 2024-6-13
Front Pharmacol. 2023-8-23
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016-3
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016-6
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015
Am Fam Physician. 2015-8-15