Naidoo Anushka, Chirehwa Maxwell, McIlleron Helen, Naidoo Kogieleum, Essack Sabiha, Yende-Zuma Nonhlanhla, Kimba-Phongi Eddy, Adamson John, Govender Katya, Padayatchi Nesri, Denti Paolo
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1441-1449. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx004.
We compared the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin during rifampicin co-treatment or when dosed alone in African patients with drug-susceptible recurrent TB.
Patients in the intervention arm of the Improving Retreatment Success (IMPRESS) randomized controlled TB trial received 400 mg of moxifloxacin, with rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide in the treatment regimen. Moxifloxacin concentrations were measured in plasma during rifampicin-based TB treatment and again 4 weeks after treatment completion, when given alone as a single dose. Moxifloxacin concentration-time data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models.
We included 58 patients; 42 (72.4%) were HIV co-infected and 40 (95%) of these were on efavirenz-based ART. Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics was best described using a two-compartment disposition model with first-order lagged absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. Oral clearance (CL/F) of moxifloxacin during rifampicin-based TB treatment was 24.3 L/h for a typical patient (fat-free mass of 47 kg), resulting in an AUC of 16.5 mg·h/L. This exposure was 7.8% lower than the AUC following the single dose of moxifloxacin given alone after TB treatment completion. In HIV-co-infected patients taking efavirenz-based ART, CL/F of moxifloxacin was increased by 42.4%, resulting in a further 30% reduction in moxifloxacin AUC.
Moxifloxacin clearance was high and plasma concentrations low in our patients overall. Moxifloxacin AUC was further decreased by co-administration of efavirenz-based ART and, to a lesser extent, rifampicin. The clinical relevance of the low moxifloxacin concentrations for TB treatment outcomes and the need for moxifloxacin dose adjustment in the presence of rifampicin and efavirenz co-treatment need further investigation.
我们比较了莫西沙星在利福平联合治疗期间或单独给药时,在非洲药物敏感复发性结核病患者中的药代动力学。
改善复治成功率(IMPRESS)随机对照结核病试验干预组的患者在治疗方案中接受400mg莫西沙星,联合利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺。在基于利福平的结核病治疗期间以及治疗完成后单独单次给药4周后,测量血浆中的莫西沙星浓度。使用非线性混合效应模型分析莫西沙星浓度-时间数据。
我们纳入了58名患者;42名(72.4%)合并感染HIV,其中40名(95%)接受基于依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒治疗。莫西沙星药代动力学最好用具有一级滞后吸收和消除的二室处置模型来描述,使用描述肝脏提取的半机制模型。对于典型患者(无脂肪体重47kg),在基于利福平的结核病治疗期间,莫西沙星的口服清除率(CL/F)为24.3L/h,导致AUC为16.5mg·h/L。该暴露量比结核病治疗完成后单独单次给予莫西沙星后的AUC低7.8%。在接受基于依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒治疗的合并感染HIV患者中,莫西沙星的CL/F增加了42.4%,导致莫西沙星AUC进一步降低30%。
总体而言,我们的患者中莫西沙星清除率高且血浆浓度低。基于依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒治疗联合使用时,莫西沙星AUC进一步降低,利福平联合使用时降低程度较小。莫西沙星低浓度对结核病治疗结果的临床相关性以及在利福平和依非韦伦联合治疗时调整莫西沙星剂量的必要性需要进一步研究。