Suppr超能文献

使用无框架纤维递送系统进行宫内左炔诺孕酮递送:临床经验回顾

Intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery with frameless fibrous delivery system: review of clinical experience.

作者信息

Wildemeersch Dirk, Andrade Amaury, Goldstuck Norman D, Hasskamp Thomas, Jackers Geert

机构信息

Gynecological Outpatient Clinic and IUD Training Center, Ghent, Belgium.

Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2017 Jan 21;9:49-58. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S122579. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The concept of using a frameless intrauterine device (IUD) instead of the conventional plastic framed IUD is not new. Frameless copper IUDs have been available since the late 1990s. They rely on an anchoring system to retain in the uterine cavity. The clinical experience with these IUDs suggests that frameless IUDs fit better as they are thin and, therefore, do not disturb or irritate the uterus. High tolerance and continuation rates have been achieved as complaints of pain are virtually nonexistent and the impact on menstrual blood loss is minimal. Conventional levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) are very popular as they significantly reduce menstrual bleeding and provide highly effective contraception. However, continuation of use remains problematic, particularly in young users. Total or partial expulsion and displacement of the LNG-IUS also occur too often due to spatial incompatibility within a small uterine cavity, as strong uterine contractions originate, attempting to get rid of the bothersome IUD/IUS. If not expelled, embedment ensues, often leading to chronic pain and early removal of the IUD/IUS. Several studies conducted recently have requested attention to the relationship between the LNG-IUS and the endometrial cavity. Some authors have proposed to measure the cavity width prior to inserting an IUD, as many uterine cavities are much smaller than the currently existing LNG-IUSs. A frameless fibrous drug delivery system fits, in principle, in all uterine cavities and may therefore be preferable to framed drug delivery systems. This review examines the clinical performance, acceptability, and potential of the frameless LNG-IUS (FibroPlant) when used for contraception, treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and endometrial suppression in women using estrogen replacement therapy, endometrial hyperplasia, and other gynecological conditions. The review concludes that FibroPlant LNG-IUS offers unique advantages in reducing side effects.

摘要

使用无框架宫内节育器(IUD)而非传统塑料框架IUD的概念并不新鲜。自20世纪90年代末以来,无框架铜IUD就已问世。它们依靠一种锚定系统来保留在子宫腔内。这些IUD的临床经验表明,无框架IUD因其薄而更贴合子宫,因此不会干扰或刺激子宫。由于几乎不存在疼痛主诉且对月经失血的影响极小,所以实现了高耐受性和持续使用率。传统的左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统(LNG-IUS)非常受欢迎,因为它们能显著减少月经出血并提供高效避孕。然而,持续使用仍然存在问题,尤其是在年轻使用者中。由于子宫小腔内空间不匹配,LNG-IUS的完全或部分排出及移位也经常发生,因为会引发强烈的子宫收缩,试图排出烦人的IUD/IUS。如果未排出,就会发生嵌入,常常导致慢性疼痛和IUD/IUS的早期取出。最近进行的几项研究要求关注LNG-IUS与子宫内膜腔之间的关系。一些作者提议在插入IUD前测量宫腔宽度,因为许多子宫腔比目前现有的LNG-IUS小得多。原则上,一种无框架纤维药物递送系统适合所有子宫腔,因此可能比有框架的药物递送系统更可取。本综述探讨了无框架LNG-IUS(FibroPlant)用于避孕、治疗月经过多、痛经以及在接受雌激素替代疗法、子宫内膜增生和其他妇科疾病的女性中抑制子宫内膜时的临床性能、可接受性和潜力。综述得出结论,FibroPlant LNG-IUS在减少副作用方面具有独特优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa69/5268329/286dd9e65f29/ijwh-9-049Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery with frameless fibrous delivery system: review of clinical experience.
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Jan 21;9:49-58. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S122579. eCollection 2017.
2
Use of frameless intrauterine devices and systems in young nulliparous and adolescent women: results of a multicenter study.
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 6;6:727-34. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S65462. eCollection 2014.
4
A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Drug Saf. 1996 Dec;15(6):430-40. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615060-00006.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A multicenter study assessing uterine cavity width in over 400 nulliparous women seeking IUD insertion using 2D and 3D sonography.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
2
Side effects of intrauterine devices are often related to disproportion with the endometrial cavity-is there a role for pre-insertion ultrasound?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jun;201:215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.044. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
3
Prevention of the recurrence of symptom and lesions after conservative surgery for endometriosis.
Fertil Steril. 2015 Oct;104(4):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
An overview of treatments for endometriosis.
JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):296-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17119.
5
Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):718-726. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000475.
6
Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion.
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 7;6:735-44. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S63167. eCollection 2014.
7
Use of frameless intrauterine devices and systems in young nulliparous and adolescent women: results of a multicenter study.
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 6;6:727-34. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S65462. eCollection 2014.
8
Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review.
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):570-82. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt016. Epub 2013 May 31.
9
Malpositioned intrauterine contraceptive devices: risk factors, outcomes, and future pregnancies.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1014-1020. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182316308.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验