Gonzalez Adam M, Sell Katie M, Ghigiarelli Jamie J, Kelly Christopher F, Shone Edward W, Accetta Matthew R, Baum Jamie B, Mangine Gerald T
a Department of Health Professions, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.
b Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017 Apr;42(4):443-448. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0564. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of phosphatidic acid (PA) supplementation on muscle thickness and strength following an 8 week supervised resistance-training program. Fifteen resistance trained men (22.8 ± 3.5 years; 80.6 ± 8.7 kg; 178.1 ± 5.6 cm; 14.6% ± 8.8% body fat) were randomly assigned to a group that either consumed 750 mg of PA or a placebo (PL). Testing was carried out before (PRE) and after (POST) training/supplementation for muscle thickness and strength. Muscle thickness of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii (TB) muscles were measured via ultrasonography, along with 1 repetition maximum (1RM) of squat, deadlift, and bench press. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), using PRE values as the covariate, did not reveal any group differences for measures of muscle thickness in the RF (PA: 3.6% ± 5.2%; PL: 3.2% ± 4.2%, p = 0.97), VL (PA: 23.4% ± 18.1%, PL: 12.5% ± 15.4%, p = 0.37), BB (PA: 3.7% ± 6.4%, PL: 9.6% ± 12.4%, p = 0.86), or TB (PA: 15.1% ± 17.9%, PL: 10.7% ± 19.3%, p = 0.79). Likewise, no group differences were observed in changes in squat (PA: 8.4% ± 4.1%, PL: 8.1% ± 4.2%, p = 0.79), deadlift (PA: 10.1% ± 10.1%, PL: 8.9% ± 9.5%, p = 0.66), or bench press (PA: 5.7% ± 5.5%, PL: 5.1% ± 3.0%, p = 0.76) exercises. Collectively, however, all participants experienced significant (p < 0.05) improvements in each measure of muscle thickness and strength. Results of this study suggest that PA supplementation, in combination with a 3 days·week resistance-training program for 8 weeks, did not have a differential effect compared with PL on changes in muscle thickness or 1RM strength.
本研究的目的是调查在为期8周的有监督的抗阻训练计划后,补充磷脂酸(PA)对肌肉厚度和力量的影响。15名经过抗阻训练的男性(22.8±3.5岁;80.6±8.7千克;178.1±5.6厘米;体脂率14.6%±8.8%)被随机分为两组,一组摄入750毫克PA,另一组摄入安慰剂(PL)。在训练/补充前后进行测试,以测量肌肉厚度和力量。通过超声测量股直肌(RF)、股外侧肌(VL)、肱二头肌(BB)和肱三头肌(TB)的肌肉厚度,并测量深蹲、硬拉和卧推的1次最大重复量(1RM)。以训练前(PRE)值作为协变量的协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,RF(PA组:3.6%±5.2%;PL组:3.2%±4.2%,p=0.97)、VL(PA组:23.4%±18.1%;PL组:12.5%±15.4%,p=0.37)、BB(PA组:3.7%±6.4%;PL组:9.6%±12.4%,p=0.86)或TB(PA组:15.1%±17.9%;PL组:10.7%±19.3%,p=0.79)的肌肉厚度测量指标在两组间无差异。同样,深蹲(PA组:8.4%±4.1%;PL组:8.1%±4.2%,p=0.79)、硬拉(PA组:10.1%±10.1%;PL组:8.9%±9.5%,p=0.66)或卧推(PA组:5.7%±5.5%;PL组:5.1%±3.0%,p=0.76)练习的变化在两组间也未观察到差异。然而,总体而言,所有参与者在肌肉厚度和力量的各项测量指标上均有显著(p<0.05)改善。本研究结果表明,在为期8周、每周3天的抗阻训练计划基础上补充PA,与补充PL相比,对肌肉厚度变化或1RM力量没有差异影响。