J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Oct;22(4):502. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000085. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Reports an error in "Linking Boundary Crossing from Work to Nonwork to Work-Related Rumination across Time: A Variable- and Person-Oriented Approach" by Ulla Kinnunen, Taru Feldt, Jessica de Bloom, Marjaana Sianoja, Kalevi Korpela and Sabine Geurts (, Advanced Online Publication, Apr 28, 2016, np). There were errors in two separate sections of the article. The final sentence preceding Hypothesis 4 in "The Present Study" section should read, "We did not hypothesize that the specific forms of work-related thoughts (i.e., affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, or lack of psychological detachment) would be differently associated with stability or changes in boundary crossing behavior." The fifth sentence in the second paragraph of the "Identifying Subgroups of Boundary Crossing Behavior Across Time" subsection of the "Results" section should read, "Group 5 (n = 162, 19%), characterized by stable low boundary crossing behavior across time (M = 1.37 for Time 1 and M = 1.34 for Time 2), and Group 6 (n = 154, 18%), characterized by stable high boundary crossing behavior (M = 4.54 for Time 1 and M = 4.60 for Time 2), were almost equally large in size." (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-20812-001.) This 1-year follow-up study (N = 841) investigated the relationship between boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork and work-related rumination (i.e., affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time). This relationship is important to examine as work-related rumination is a risk factor for poor recovery and ill-health over time. The aims were twofold: first, to examine these relationships in terms of temporal ordering, and, second, to show how individual differences regarding stability and change of boundaries from work to nonwork are reflected in work-related rumination across time. The structural equation modeling analyses lent support to the hypothesized normal causation model compared with the reversed causation and reciprocal models. However, only the cross-lagged relationship between high boundary crossing behavior at T1 and lack of psychological detachment at T2 was significant. Through latent profile analysis, 6 subgroups of boundary crossing behavior across time were identified. Over 70% of the employees belonged to the stable (low, moderate, high) and about one-third to the changing (mostly increasing) boundary crossing subgroups. Employees in the 2 stable (high and moderate) boundary crossing subgroups reported less psychological detachment and more problem-solving pondering during off-job time than did those in the low boundary crossing subgroup. Employees in the change groups reported simultaneous expected changes, especially in their problem-solving pondering. No effects on affective rumination were found. Thus frequent boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork plays a different role regarding the various forms of work-related rumination during nonwork. (PsycINFO Database Record
报告了一篇题为“跨越时间将工作到非工作再到工作相关的沉思联系起来的错误：一种变量和个体导向的方法”（Ulla Kinnunen，Taru Feldt，Jessica de Bloom，Marjaana Sianoja，Kalevi Korpela 和 Sabine Geurts，，高级在线出版，2016 年 4 月 28 日，np）中的错误。文章中有两个独立的部分存在错误。“本研究”部分假设 4 之前的最后一句话应该是，“我们并没有假设工作相关思想的具体形式（即情感沉思、解决问题的思考或缺乏心理脱离）会与边界跨越行为的稳定性或变化有不同的关联。”“结果”部分“识别随时间变化的边界跨越行为的亚组”小节第二段的第五句话应该是，“第 5 组（n=162，19%），其特点是跨越时间的稳定低边界行为（时间 1 的 M=1.37，时间 2 的 M=1.34），第 6 组（n=154，18%），其特点是稳定的高边界行为（时间 1 的 M=4.54，时间 2 的 M=4.60），规模几乎相等。”（原始文章的摘要如下 2016-20812-001 记录。）本研究（N=841）进行了为期 1 年的随访，以调查从工作到非工作的边界跨越行为与工作相关的沉思（即情感沉思、解决问题的思考和工作期间缺乏心理脱离）之间的关系。随着时间的推移，工作相关的沉思是导致恢复不良和健康状况不佳的风险因素，因此研究这种关系非常重要。目的有两个：首先，从时间顺序的角度来检验这些关系；其次，展示从工作到非工作的边界稳定性和变化的个体差异如何反映在随时间变化的工作相关沉思中。结构方程模型分析支持假设的正常因果模型，而不是反向因果模型和交互模型。然而，只有 T1 高边界跨越行为与 T2 缺乏心理脱离之间的交叉滞后关系具有显著性。通过潜在剖面分析，确定了随时间变化的 6 个边界跨越行为亚组。超过 70%的员工属于稳定（低、中、高），约三分之一属于变化（主要是增加）边界跨越亚组。与低边界跨越亚组相比，在非工作时间，处于 2 个稳定（高和中）边界跨越亚组的员工报告的心理脱离较少，解决问题的思考较多。在变化组中，报告了同时发生的预期变化，尤其是在解决问题的思考方面。在情感沉思方面没有发现任何影响。因此，频繁的从工作到非工作的边界跨越行为在非工作期间对各种形式的工作相关沉思起着不同的作用。
