Atherton K, Young B, Salmon P
Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12647. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Clinical practice in haematological oncology often involves difficult diagnostic and treatment decisions. In this context, understanding patients' information needs and the functions that information serves for them is particularly important. We systematically reviewed qualitative and quantitative evidence on haematological oncology patients' information needs to inform how these needs can best be addressed in clinical practice. PsycINFO, Medline and CINAHL Plus electronic databases were searched for relevant empirical papers published from January 2003 to July 2016. Synthesis of the findings drew on meta-ethnography and meta-study. Most quantitative studies used a survey design and indicated that patients are largely content with the information they receive from physicians, however much or little they actually receive, although a minority of patients are not content with information. Qualitative studies suggest that a sense of being in a caring relationship with a physician allows patients to feel content with the information they have been given, whereas patients who lack such a relationship want more information. The qualitative evidence can help explain the lack of association between the amount of information received and contentment with it in the quantitative research. Trusting relationships are integral to helping patients feel that their information needs have been met.
血液肿瘤学的临床实践常常涉及艰难的诊断和治疗决策。在此背景下,了解患者的信息需求以及信息对他们所起的作用尤为重要。我们系统回顾了关于血液肿瘤学患者信息需求的定性和定量证据,以便为如何在临床实践中最好地满足这些需求提供依据。我们检索了PsycINFO、Medline和CINAHL Plus电子数据库,查找2003年1月至2016年7月发表的相关实证论文。研究结果的综合分析采用了元民族志和元研究方法。大多数定量研究采用调查设计,结果表明,无论实际获得的信息多寡,患者大多对从医生那里得到的信息感到满意,不过也有少数患者对信息不满意。定性研究表明,与医生建立起关怀关系能让患者对所获信息感到满意,而缺乏这种关系的患者则希望获得更多信息。定性证据有助于解释定量研究中所获信息量与对信息的满意度之间缺乏关联的现象。信任关系对于帮助患者感到其信息需求得到满足至关重要。