Baccini Michela, Mattei Alessandra, Mealli Fabrizia, Bertazzi Pier Alberto, Carugno Michele
Department of Statistics, Informatics, Applications "G. Parenti", Università di Firenze, Viale Morgagni 59, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Environ Health. 2017 Feb 10;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0215-7.
The opportunity to assess short term impact of air pollution relies on the causal interpretation of the exposure-response association. However, up to now few studies explicitly faced this issue within a causal inference framework. In this paper, we reformulated the problem of assessing the short term impact of air pollution on health using the potential outcome approach to causal inference. We considered the impact of high daily levels of particulate matter ≤10 μm in diameter (PM) on mortality within two days from the exposure in the metropolitan area of Milan (Italy), during the period 2003-2006. Our research focus was the causal impact of a hypothetical intervention setting daily air pollution levels under a pre-fixed threshold.
We applied a matching procedure based on propensity score to estimate the total number of attributable deaths (AD) during the study period. After defining the number of attributable deaths in terms of difference between potential outcomes, we used the estimated propensity score to match each high exposure day, namely each day with a level of exposure higher than 40 μg/m, with a day with similar background characteristics but a level of exposure lower than 40 μg/m. Then, we estimated the impact by comparing mortality between matched days.
During the study period daily exposures larger than 40 μg/m were responsible for 1079 deaths (90% CI: 116; 2042). The impact was more evident among the elderly than in the younger age classes. Exposures ≥ 40 μg/m were responsible, among the elderly, for 1102 deaths (90% CI: 388, 1816), of which 797 from cardiovascular causes and 243 from respiratory causes. Clear evidence of an impact on respiratory mortality was found also in the age class 65-74, with 87 AD (90% CI: 11, 163).
The propensity score matching turned out to be an appealing method to assess historical impacts in this field, which guarantees that the estimated total number of AD can be derived directly as sum of either age-specific or cause-specific AD, unlike the standard model-based procedure. For this reason, it is a promising approach to perform surveillance focusing on very specific causes of death or diseases, or on susceptible subpopulations. Finally, the propensity score matching is free from issues concerning the exposure-confounders-mortality modeling and does not involve extrapolation. On the one hand this enhances the internal validity of our results; on the other, it makes the approach scarcely appropriate for estimating future impacts.
评估空气污染短期影响的机会依赖于暴露-反应关联的因果解释。然而,到目前为止,很少有研究在因果推断框架内明确面对这个问题。在本文中,我们使用因果推断的潜在结果方法重新阐述了评估空气污染对健康短期影响的问题。我们考虑了2003 - 2006年期间,意大利米兰大都市区直径≤10μm的颗粒物(PM)日高暴露水平对暴露后两天内死亡率的影响。我们的研究重点是将每日空气污染水平设定在预先确定阈值以下的假设干预的因果影响。
我们应用基于倾向得分的匹配程序来估计研究期间的归因死亡总数(AD)。在根据潜在结果之间的差异定义归因死亡数后,我们使用估计的倾向得分将每个高暴露日(即暴露水平高于40μg/m的每一天)与背景特征相似但暴露水平低于40μg/m的一天进行匹配。然后,我们通过比较匹配日之间的死亡率来估计影响。
在研究期间,每日暴露大于40μg/m导致1079例死亡(90%置信区间:116;2042)。这种影响在老年人中比在年轻人群体中更明显。在老年人中,暴露≥40μg/m导致1102例死亡(90%置信区间:388,1816),其中797例死于心血管原因,243例死于呼吸道原因。在65 - 74岁年龄组中也发现了对呼吸道死亡率有影响的明确证据,有87例归因死亡(90%置信区间:11,163)。
倾向得分匹配被证明是评估该领域历史影响的一种有吸引力的方法,与基于标准模型的程序不同,它保证了估计的归因死亡总数可以直接作为特定年龄或特定原因的归因死亡数之和得出。因此,它是一种有前景的方法,可用于针对非常特定的死亡原因或疾病,或易感亚人群进行监测。最后,倾向得分匹配不存在与暴露-混杂因素-死亡率建模相关的问题,也不涉及外推。一方面,这增强了我们结果的内部有效性;另一方面,这使得该方法几乎不适用于估计未来影响。