Suppr超能文献

成人心理理论自动加工的当前证据。

Current evidence for automatic Theory of Mind processing in adults.

作者信息

Schneider Dana, Slaughter Virginia P, Dux Paul E

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Cognition. 2017 May;162:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is thought to play a key role in social information processing as it refers to the ability of individuals to represent the mental states of others (e.g., intentions, desires, beliefs). A provocative hypothesis has been put forward which espouses the existence of two ToM systems: one that is implicit and involves the automatic analysis of the belief states of others and another that is not automatic and is involved in explicitly reasoning about others' mental states. Recently, Phillips et al. (2015) have suggested that there is limited evidence for automatic ToM processing, after identifying a confound in a previous high-profile paper supporting the existence of this cognitive operation in infants and adults (Kovács, Téglás, & Endress, 2010). Here, we take a broader view of the literature and find, contrary to the conclusions of Phillips et al., that there is a substantial body of literature which demonstrates that adult humans are able to engage in unconscious and unintentional, and thus automatic, analyses of others' mental states. However, whether this ability is best described under a one, two or multiple systems ToM account remains to be determined.

摘要

心理理论(ToM)被认为在社会信息处理中起着关键作用,因为它指的是个体表征他人心理状态(如意图、欲望、信念)的能力。有人提出了一个颇具争议的假设,主张存在两种心理理论系统:一种是隐性的,涉及对他人信念状态的自动分析;另一种不是自动的,涉及对他人心理状态的明确推理。最近,菲利普斯等人(2015年)指出,在发现之前一篇备受瞩目的论文存在混淆因素后,支持婴儿和成人存在这种认知操作的自动心理理论加工的证据有限(科瓦奇、泰格拉斯和恩德雷斯,2010年)。在这里,我们对文献进行了更广泛的审视,发现与菲利普斯等人的结论相反,有大量文献表明成年人类能够对他人的心理状态进行无意识、无意图,因而也是自动的分析。然而,这种能力是否最好用单系统、双系统或多系统心理理论来描述,仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验