Morin P-A, Chorfi Y, Dubuc J, Roy J-P, Santschi D, Dufour S
Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Département des Sciences Cliniques, Université de Montréal, 3200 rue Sicotte, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada, J2S 7C6.
Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 rue Sicotte, CP 5000, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada, J2S 7C6.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Apr;100(4):3086-3090. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11872. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Body condition score (BCS) is strongly correlated with energy reserves. The ease, rapidity of scoring, and high intra- and inter-observer repeatability make it a widely used herd management tool in bovine practice and in scientific studies. Loss or gain of BCS, rather than a single BCS measurement, is frequently used to monitor energy balance in dairy cows. It is unknown if the difference between 2 BCS measures taken at different moments (ΔBCS) would demonstrate inter-observer agreement similar to that of a single BCS measurement. The objective of this study was to compare inter-observer agreement of BCS and ΔBCS in dairy cows when multiple observers perform data collection. An observational study was conducted between April and September 2015; 3 observers independently assessed BCS of 73 Holstein cows from 1 commercial dairy herd. Body condition score assessments of the animals were performed between 1 and 20 d in milk (early lactation; exam 1) and again between 41 and 60 d in milk (peak of milk production; exam 2). Quadratic weighted kappa (κ) was computed to quantify agreement between observers for single BCS measurements and ΔBCS. For single BCS measurements, κ of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.85) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.89) were obtained for exam 1 and exam 2, respectively. Such values would be interpreted as strong agreement and are consistent with the available literature on BCS repeatability. When computing agreement for ΔBCS, a κ value of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.63) was obtained, suggesting moderate agreement between observers. These findings suggest that studies investigating single BCS measures could use many observers with a high degree of accuracy in the results. When ΔBCS is the parameter of interest, more reliable results would be obtained if one observer conducts all assessments.
体况评分(BCS)与能量储备密切相关。其评分简便、迅速,且观察者内和观察者间的重复性高,使其成为牛实践和科学研究中广泛使用的畜群管理工具。在奶牛中,常使用BCS的增减而非单一的BCS测量值来监测能量平衡。不同时刻进行的两次BCS测量之间的差异(ΔBCS)是否能表现出与单一BCS测量类似的观察者间一致性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较多名观察者进行数据收集时,奶牛BCS和ΔBCS的观察者间一致性。2015年4月至9月进行了一项观察性研究;3名观察者独立评估了来自1个商业奶牛场的73头荷斯坦奶牛的BCS。在产奶1至20天(早期泌乳;检查1)以及产奶41至60天(产奶高峰期;检查2)对动物进行体况评分评估。计算二次加权kappa(κ)值以量化观察者间对单一BCS测量值和ΔBCS的一致性。对于单一BCS测量,检查1和检查2分别获得κ值为0.79(95%CI:0.69,0.85)和0.84(95%CI:0.77,0.89)。这些值可解释为高度一致,且与关于BCS重复性的现有文献一致。计算ΔBCS的一致性时,获得的κ值为0.49(95%CI:0.32,0.63),表明观察者间一致性为中等。这些发现表明,研究单一BCS测量的研究可以使用多名观察者,结果具有高度准确性。当ΔBCS是感兴趣的参数时,如果由一名观察者进行所有评估,将获得更可靠的结果。