Hagen-Plantinga E A, Leistra M H G, Sinke J D, Vroom M W, Savelkoul H F J, Hendriks W H
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum voor Dieren, Isolatorweg 45, 1014 AS Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vet J. 2017 Feb;220:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Conflicting results have been reported in the literature in terms of the usefulness of serological testing for IgG against food allergens in dogs with cutaneous adverse food reaction (CAFR). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of a commercially available IgG ELISA for identifying food allergens in dogs, by challenging dogs with specific food ingredients, selected on the basis of IgG reactivity in serum samples. A total of 24 adult dogs with CAFR were enrolled into the study and 16 healthy dogs were included as a control group. Blood samples were obtained for measurement of specific IgG antibodies against 39 commonly used pet food ingredients by ELISA. Participating owners were surveyed to obtain information on their pet's dietary history. Eleven healthy control dogs and 12 dogs with CAFR were subsequently challenged in a blinded cross-over design experiment with both positive and negative food ingredients, selected on the basis of the ELISA test results. There was substantial individual variation in ELISA test results to the various food allergens, but no significant difference in IgG reactivity comparing the CAFR and control groups. None of the control dogs developed any clinical signs of an allergic reaction during the dietary challenge study. In the CAFR group, six of 12 dogs developed clinical signs after the negative challenge, and two of nine dogs developed clinical signs after the positive challenge. It was concluded that the ELISA test for dietary allergen-specific IgG is of limited value in the management of dogs with CAFR.
关于血清学检测犬皮肤食物不良反应(CAFR)中针对食物过敏原的IgG的实用性,文献中报道的结果相互矛盾。本研究的目的是通过用基于血清样本中IgG反应性选择的特定食物成分对犬进行激发试验,评估一种市售IgG酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在鉴定犬食物过敏原方面的适用性。共有24只患有CAFR的成年犬被纳入研究,16只健康犬作为对照组。通过ELISA获取血样,以测量针对39种常用宠物食品成分的特异性IgG抗体。对参与研究的犬主进行调查,以获取其宠物饮食史的信息。随后,根据ELISA检测结果,选取阳性和阴性食物成分,以双盲交叉设计实验对11只健康对照犬和12只患有CAFR的犬进行激发试验。对于各种食物过敏原,ELISA检测结果存在很大的个体差异,但CAFR组和对照组在IgG反应性方面没有显著差异。在饮食激发试验研究期间,没有一只对照犬出现任何过敏反应的临床症状。在CAFR组中,12只犬中有6只在阴性激发试验后出现临床症状,9只犬中有2只在阳性激发试验后出现临床症状。得出的结论是,饮食过敏原特异性IgG的ELISA检测在CAFR犬的管理中价值有限。