OBJECTIVE

To study the role of different scale structure of Ti implants on the biological behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVECs) and to reveal the role of material surface topographical features on peri-implant angiogenesis.

METHODS

Titanium (Ti) discs with different surface structures (Ti discs with smooth surface, Ti discs with nano scale structure, Ti discs with micro scale structure and Ti discs with micro/nano scale structure, named as SM-Ti, Nano-Ti, Micro-Ti and Micro/Nano-Ti, respectively) were prepared and their surface topographical features were confirmed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation. HUVECs were cultured on these Ti discs. Biological outcomes of HUVECs on different surfaces were carried out, including cell adhesive capacity, proliferation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production and intracellular expression of Ca(2+).

RESULTS

The results of SEM images and immunofluorescence double staining of rhodamine-phalloidin and DAPI showed that compared with the SM-Ti and Nano-Ti group, the adhesive capacity and proliferation behavior of HUVECs on the surfaces of Micro-Ti and Micro/Nano-Ti was decreased. The results of culturing HUVECs on different groups of Ti discs after 24 hours showed that the cells number grew from (18±4) to (42±6)/ vision on SM-Ti, (28±6) to (52±10)/vision on Nano-Ti, (20±4) to (21±6)/vision on Micro-Ti and (16±4) to (18±6)/vision on Micro/Nano-Ti. Moreover, compared with the adhesion and proliferation of HUVECs on SM-Ti group and Nano-Ti, the adhesion and proliferation of HUVECs on Micro-Ti group and Micro/Nano-Ti group was significantly reduced (P<0.05).The results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed that the VEGF productions of SM-Ti, Nano-Ti, Micro-Ti and Micro/Nano-Ti were (690±35) ng/L, (560±20) ng/L, (474±43) ng/L and (517±29) ng/L, respectively. Moreover, compared with the VEGF production of HUVECs on SM-Ti group, the VEGF production of HUVECs on Micro-Ti group and Micro/Nano-Ti group was significantly reduced (P<0.05). The results of Ca(2+) ion detection showed that the Ca(2+) expression of HUVECs on Micro-Ti and Micro/Nano-Ti was significantly higher than that on the surface of SM-Ti and Nano-Ti. These results implied that the over expressed Ca(2+) might contributed to the impaired biological function of HUVECs on Micro-Ti and Micro/Nano-Ti.

CONCLUSION

Different topographical features on titanium influenced the biological behaviors of the HUVECs, which may illustrate how topographical features of Ti implant affect peri-implant angiogenesis. These results also suggest that the biological behaviors of HUVECs might be relative to the changed expression of intracellular Ca(2+).