Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund University, Ardeystr. 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany.
Research Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bürkle de la Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Sep;91(9):3051-3064. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1934-9. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Human data about the potency of ethyl acrylate to evoke sensory irritation is currently not available. Therefore, we conducted an experimental exposure study and the magnitude of chemosensory effects in healthy human volunteers was mathematically modeled by combining the factors current concentration (c) and duration/time (t). In a repeated-measures design, 19 subjects were exposed for 4 h to constant and varying concentrations (including peaks of 5 and 10 ppm) of ethyl acrylate with either a 2.5 or 5 ppm time-weighted average (TWA) concentration. Clean air served as control condition. Nasal lavage fluid, eye blinking frequencies, and rhinomanometry were used as physiological measures of sensory irritation. Several subjective ratings assessed olfactory and trigeminal perceptions. The blinking frequency was significantly increased during the varying 5 ppm condition. Regardless of the TWA concentration, varying exposures caused stronger effects than constant exposures. Our mathematical modeling showed that olfactory perceptions generally decreased over time while ratings of eye irritation increased over time even under the constant 5 ppm condition. Including the current concentration in the mathematical modeling always increased the goodness of fit substantially. The results showed that the intensity of sensory irritation could be predicted best with a complex c × t model. During the 2.5 ppm conditions, only the current concentration predicted the ratings and time-dependent processes could not be observed. However, in both 5 ppm TWA conditions strong eye irritations and increased blinking frequency, only at the end of the 4-h exposures a dose-dependency of these adverse effects was clearly shown.
目前尚无关于丙烯酸乙酯引起感官刺激的人体数据。因此,我们进行了一项实验性暴露研究,并通过将当前浓度(c)和持续时间/时间(t)这两个因素相结合,对健康人类志愿者的化学感官效应的程度进行了数学建模。在一项重复测量设计中,19 名受试者在恒定和变化的浓度(包括 5 和 10 ppm 的峰值)下暴露于丙烯酸乙酯中 4 小时,其中浓度为 2.5 或 5 ppm 的时间加权平均值(TWA)。清洁空气作为对照条件。鼻洗液、眨眼频率和鼻阻力计被用作感官刺激的生理测量。一些主观评价评估了嗅觉和三叉神经感知。在变化的 5 ppm 条件下,眨眼频率显著增加。无论 TWA 浓度如何,变化的暴露比恒定的暴露引起更强的影响。我们的数学模型表明,嗅觉感知通常随着时间的推移而降低,而眼睛刺激的评价则随着时间的推移而增加,即使在恒定的 5 ppm 条件下也是如此。在数学建模中包含当前浓度总是会大大提高拟合优度。结果表明,使用复杂的 c×t 模型可以最好地预测感官刺激的强度。在 2.5 ppm 条件下,只有当前浓度可以预测评价,并且无法观察到时间相关的过程。然而,在两种 5 ppm TWA 条件下,强烈的眼睛刺激和眨眼频率增加,只有在 4 小时暴露的最后阶段,才能清楚地显示出这些不良反应的剂量依赖性。