Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct 15;38(5):120-136.
This article presents evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents. A guideline panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated recommendations to address clinical questions in relation to the efficacy, retention, and potential side effects of sealants to prevent dental caries; their efficacy compared with fluoride varnishes; and a head-to-head comparison of the different types of sealant material used to prevent caries on pits-and-fissures of occlusal surfaces.
This is an update of the ADA 2008 recommendations on the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other sources to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on the effect of sealants (available on the U.S. market) when applied to the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the quality of the evidence and to move from the evidence to the decisions.
The guideline panel formulated 3 main recommendations. They concluded that sealants are effective in preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal carious lesions of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents compared with the nonuse of sealants or use of fluoride varnishes. They also concluded that sealants could minimize the progression of non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions (also referred to as initial lesions) that receive a sealant. Finally, based on the available limited evidence, the panel was unable to provide specific recommendations on the relative merits of 1 type of sealant material over the others. Conclusions and practical implications: These recommendations are designed to inform practitioners during the clinical decision-making process in relation to the prevention of occlusal carious lesions in children and adolescents. Clinicians are encouraged to discuss the information in this guideline with patients or the parents of patients. The authors recommend that clinicians re-orient their efforts toward increasing the use of sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents.
本文提出了关于在儿童和青少年的乳磨牙及恒磨牙咬合面使用窝沟封闭剂的循证临床建议。由美国牙科协会(ADA)科学事务委员会和美国儿科学会召集的一个指南小组进行了系统综述,并制定了相关建议,以解决与窝沟封闭剂预防龋齿的疗效、保留率及潜在副作用;与氟漆相比的疗效;以及用于预防咬合面窝沟龋齿的不同类型封闭剂材料的直接比较等临床问题。
这是ADA 2008年关于在乳磨牙和恒磨牙咬合面使用窝沟封闭剂建议的更新。作者在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库及其他来源进行了系统检索,以识别报告(美国市场上可用的)封闭剂应用于乳磨牙和恒磨牙咬合面效果的随机对照试验。作者采用推荐分级评估、制定与评价方法来评估证据质量,并从证据得出决策。
指南小组制定了3项主要建议。他们得出结论,与不使用封闭剂或使用氟漆相比,封闭剂在预防和阻止儿童及青少年乳磨牙和恒磨牙的窝沟咬合龋损方面是有效的。他们还得出结论,封闭剂可使接受封闭剂的非龋洞性咬合龋损(也称为初始龋损)的进展最小化。最后,基于现有的有限证据,该小组无法就一种封闭剂材料相对于其他材料的相对优点提供具体建议。结论及实际意义:这些建议旨在为从业者在预防儿童和青少年咬合龋损的临床决策过程中提供参考。鼓励临床医生与患者或患者家长讨论本指南中的信息。作者建议临床医生重新调整工作方向,以增加在儿童和青少年乳磨牙及恒磨牙咬合面使用封闭剂的比例。