Suppr超能文献

静脉注射腺苷期间,最小远端与主动脉压力比值与充血峰值之间的时间分离。

Temporal dissociation between the minimal distal-to-aortic pressure ratio and peak hyperemia during intravenous adenosine infusion.

作者信息

Casadonte Lorena, Marques Koen M, Spaan Jos A E, Siebes Maria

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and.

Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017 May 1;312(5):H992-H1001. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00632.2016. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

Abstract

The present study sought to compare the temporal relation between maximal coronary flow (peak hyperemia) and minimal coronary-to-aortic pressure ratio (P/P) for intracoronary (IC) and intravenous (IV) adenosine administration. Peak hyperemia is assumed to coincide with the minimal P/P value. However, this has not been confirmed for systemic hemodynamic variations during IV adenosine infusion. Hemodynamic responses to IV and IC adenosine administration were obtained in 12 patients (14 lesions) using combined IC pressure and flow velocity measurements. A fluid dynamic model was used to predict the change in P/P for different stenosis severities and varying P Hemodynamic variability during IV adenosine hyperemia was greater than during IC adenosine, as assessed by the coefficient of variation. During IV adenosine, flow velocity peaked 28 ± 4 (SE) s after the onset of hyperemia, while P/P reached a minimum (0.82 ± 0.01) 22 ± 7 s later ( < 0.05), when P had declined by 6.1% and hyperemic velocity by 4.5% ( < 0.01). Model outcomes corroborated the role of variable P in this dissociation. In contrast, maximal flow and minimal P/P coincided for IC adenosine, with IV-equivalent peak velocities and a higher P/P ratio (0.86 ± 0.01, < 0.01). Hemodynamic variability during continuous IV adenosine infusion can lead to temporal dissociation of minimal P/P and peak hyperemia, in contrast to IC adenosine injection, where maximal velocity and minimal P/P coincide. Despite this variability, stenosis hemodynamics remained stable with both ways of adenosine administration. Our findings suggest advantages of IC over IV adenosine to identify maximal hyperemia from pressure-only measurements. Systemic hemodynamic variability during intravenous adenosine infusion produces substantial temporal dissociation between peak hyperemia appraised by coronary flow velocity and the minimal distal-to-aortic pressure ratio commonly used to determine functional stenosis severity. This dissociation was absent for intracoronary adenosine administration and tended to be mitigated in patients receiving Ca antagonists.

摘要

本研究旨在比较冠状动脉内(IC)和静脉内(IV)给予腺苷时,最大冠状动脉血流(充血峰值)与最小冠状动脉-主动脉压力比值(P/P)之间的时间关系。假定充血峰值与最小P/P值一致。然而,静脉输注腺苷期间的全身血流动力学变化尚未得到证实。通过联合测量IC压力和流速,获得了12例患者(14处病变)对静脉和冠状动脉内给予腺苷的血流动力学反应。使用流体动力学模型预测不同狭窄严重程度和不同P时P/P的变化。通过变异系数评估,静脉腺苷充血期间的血流动力学变异性大于冠状动脉内腺苷。静脉给予腺苷时,流速在充血开始后28±4(SE)秒达到峰值,而P/P在22±7秒后达到最小值(0.82±0.01)(P<0.05),此时P下降了6.1%,充血速度下降了4.5%(P<0.01)。模型结果证实了可变P在这种分离中的作用。相比之下,冠状动脉内腺苷的最大血流与最小P/P同时出现,具有与静脉给药相当的峰值流速和更高的P/P比值(0.86±0.01,P<0.01)。与冠状动脉内注射腺苷不同,持续静脉输注腺苷期间的血流动力学变异性可导致最小P/P与充血峰值的时间分离,冠状动脉内注射时最大流速与最小P/P同时出现。尽管存在这种变异性,但两种腺苷给药方式下狭窄部位的血流动力学均保持稳定。我们的研究结果表明,冠状动脉内给予腺苷相对于静脉给予腺苷,在仅通过压力测量来识别最大充血方面具有优势。静脉输注腺苷期间的全身血流动力学变异性导致通过冠状动脉流速评估的充血峰值与通常用于确定功能性狭窄严重程度的最小远端-主动脉压力比值之间出现显著的时间分离。冠状动脉内给予腺苷时不存在这种分离,并且在接受钙拮抗剂的患者中这种分离倾向于减轻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验