Suppr超能文献

多供体强化粪菌移植治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。

Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, QLD, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Departments of Gastroenterology and Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1218-1228. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30182-4. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intestinal microbiota is implicated in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Faecal microbiota transplantation is a novel form of therapeutic microbial manipulation, but its efficacy in ulcerative colitis is uncertain. We aimed to establish the efficacy of intensive-dosing, multidonor, faecal microbiota transplantation in active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at three hospitals in Australia. We randomly allocated patients with active ulcerative colitis (Mayo score 4-10) in a 1:1 ratio, using a pre-established randomisation list, to either faecal microbiota transplantation or placebo colonoscopic infusion, followed by enemas 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Patients, treating clinicians, and other study staff were unaware of the assigned treatment. Faecal microbiota transplantation enemas were each derived from between three and seven unrelated donors. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic remission or response (Mayo score ≤2, all subscores ≤1, and ≥1 point reduction in endoscopy subscore) at week 8. Analysis was by modified intention-to-treat and included all patients receiving one study dose. We performed 16S rRNA stool analysis to assess associated microbial changes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01896635. The trial has ended; this report presents the final analysis.

FINDINGS

From November, 2013, to May, 2015, 85 patients were enrolled to our trial, of whom 42 were randomly assigned faecal microbiota transplantation and 43 were allocated placebo. One patient assigned faecal microbiota transplantation and three allocated placebo did not receive study treatment and were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was achieved in 11 (27%) of 41 patients allocated faecal microbiota transplantation versus three (8%) of 40 who were assigned placebo (risk ratio 3·6, 95% CI 1·1-11·9; p=0·021). Adverse events were reported by 32 (78%) of 41 patients allocated faecal microbiota transplantation and 33 (83%) of 40 who were assigned placebo; most were self-limiting gastrointestinal complaints, with no significant difference in number or type of adverse events between treatment groups. Serious adverse events occurred in two patients assigned faecal microbiota transplantation and in one allocated placebo. Microbial diversity increased with and persisted after faecal microbiota transplantation. Several bacterial taxa were associated with clinical outcome; in particular, the presence of Fusobacterium spp was associated with lack of remission.

INTERPRETATION

Intensive-dosing, multidonor, faecal microbiota transplantation induces clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in active ulcerative colitis and is associated with distinct microbial changes that relate to outcome. Faecal microbiota transplantation is, thus, a promising new therapeutic option for ulcerative colitis. Future work should focus on precisely defining the optimum treatment intensity and the role of donor-recipient matching based on microbial profiles.

FUNDING

Broad Medical Research Program, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, Mount Sinai (New York) SUCCESS fund, University of New South Wales.

摘要

背景

肠道微生物群与溃疡性结肠炎的发病机制有关。粪便微生物群移植是一种新形式的治疗性微生物操作,但它在溃疡性结肠炎中的疗效尚不确定。我们旨在确定强化剂量、多供体粪便微生物群移植在活动期溃疡性结肠炎中的疗效。

方法

我们在澳大利亚的三家医院进行了一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。我们以 1:1 的比例,使用预先建立的随机分组列表,将活动期溃疡性结肠炎(Mayo 评分 4-10)患者随机分配至粪便微生物群移植或安慰剂结肠镜内输注组,随后每周 5 天进行灌肠治疗,共 8 周。患者、治疗临床医生和其他研究人员均不了解分配的治疗方法。粪便微生物群移植灌肠液均来自 3 至 7 个无关供体。主要结局是第 8 周时无类固醇的临床缓解,内镜缓解或应答(Mayo 评分≤2,所有亚评分≤1,内镜亚评分至少降低 1 分)。分析采用改良意向治疗,包括所有接受一次研究剂量的患者。我们进行了 16S rRNA 粪便分析以评估相关的微生物变化。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01896635。试验已经结束;本报告介绍了最终分析结果。

结果

从 2013 年 11 月至 2015 年 5 月,我们的试验共纳入 85 例患者,其中 42 例随机分配接受粪便微生物群移植,43 例分配安慰剂。1 例接受粪便微生物群移植和 3 例接受安慰剂的患者未接受研究治疗,被排除在分析之外。41 例接受粪便微生物群移植的患者中有 11 例(27%)达到主要结局,而 40 例接受安慰剂的患者中有 3 例(8%)达到主要结局(风险比 3.6,95%CI 1.1-11.9;p=0.021)。41 例接受粪便微生物群移植的患者中有 32 例(78%)和 40 例接受安慰剂的患者中有 33 例(83%)报告了不良事件;大多数是自限性胃肠道投诉,两组之间不良事件的数量和类型无显著差异。两名接受粪便微生物群移植的患者和一名接受安慰剂的患者发生了严重不良事件。微生物多样性随着粪便微生物群移植而增加,并在移植后持续存在。一些细菌类群与临床结局相关;特别是,梭菌属的存在与缓解缺失相关。

结论

强化剂量、多供体粪便微生物群移植可诱导活动期溃疡性结肠炎的临床缓解和内镜改善,并与相关的微生物变化相关,这些变化与结局相关。因此,粪便微生物群移植是溃疡性结肠炎的一种有前途的新治疗选择。未来的工作应集中于精确确定最佳治疗强度以及基于微生物谱的供体-受者匹配的作用。

资金

广泛医学研究计划、澳大利亚胃肠病学会、西奈山(纽约)SUCCESS 基金、新南威尔士大学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验