Vigdorchik Jonathan M, Yoon Richard S, Gilbert Susannah L, Lipman Joseph D, Bostrom Mathias P
Division of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York - USA.
Division of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York - USA.
Hip Int. 2017 Jul 25;27(4):378-381. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000473. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Acetabular reconstruction in the setting of severe bone loss or pelvic discontinuity remains a challenging problem. Multiple methods of treatment have been described including antiprotrusio cages (APCs). The objective of this study is to combine biomechanical analysis of retrieved APCs with radiographic and clinical data to determine which factors influence or predict APC failure.
41 APCs were identified. Sequential radiographs were examined for cage and polyethylene cup abduction angles, change in centre of rotation, screw placement, progression of cage failure, and failure mechanism. Cages were manually examined for gross macroscopic findings, breakage, and the location of breakage. High-resolution microscopy was used for further analysis.
24 cages were included in the analysis. Mean age of patients was 64.5 years (range 43-85 years); average length of implantation was 42.5 months (range 3-108 months). Average cage abduction angles were 56°; abduction for the cemented polyethylene cup was 44°. 14 of 24 cages were broken; 10 were intact. Of the broken cages, 10/14 broke through a screw hole in the ischial flange or just superior to the ischial flange. In the intact group, 6/10 failed due to pullout of the ischial screws.
All cages had superior and lateralised centres of rotation. The majority of cages failed due to breakage or pullout at the ischial flange. Pelvic discontinuity was a large risk factor for a broken cage. Future design and technique modifications may result in superior outcomes in these complex acetabular reconstructions.
在严重骨丢失或骨盆连续性中断的情况下进行髋臼重建仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。已经描述了多种治疗方法,包括防髋臼前突笼(APCs)。本研究的目的是将回收的APCs的生物力学分析与影像学和临床数据相结合,以确定哪些因素影响或预测APCs失败。
识别出41个APCs。对连续的X线片进行检查,以观察笼子和聚乙烯杯的外展角度、旋转中心的变化、螺钉位置、笼子失败的进展情况以及失败机制。对笼子进行手动检查,以观察大体宏观表现、破损情况以及破损位置。使用高分辨率显微镜进行进一步分析。
24个笼子纳入分析。患者的平均年龄为64.5岁(范围43 - 85岁);平均植入时间为42.5个月(范围3 - 108个月)。笼子的平均外展角度为56°;骨水泥固定聚乙烯杯的外展角度为44°。24个笼子中有14个破损;10个完好。在破损的笼子中,14个中有10个通过坐骨翼上的螺钉孔或恰好在坐骨翼上方断裂。在完好组中,10个中有6个因坐骨螺钉拔出而失败。
所有笼子的旋转中心均位于上方且偏向外侧。大多数笼子因坐骨翼处的破损或拔出而失败。骨盆连续性中断是笼子破损的一个重要危险因素。未来的设计和技术改进可能会在这些复杂的髋臼重建中带来更好的结果。