Ovarian Cancer Cell Laboratory, The Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):872-878. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14543. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs) have been documented in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs). However, the rate of association between STICs and HGSOCs and, therefore, the fraction of HGSOCs that are likely to have originated from the fallopian tube (FT), has remained unclear.
To appraise the literature describing the association between STICs and established HGSOCs.
Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched.
Studies were included if they evaluated the frequency of STICs in HGSOCs, and were published in an English peer-reviewed journal.
Appropriate studies were evaluated for their compliance with the 'Strengthening and Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)' criteria.
Ten articles met the study selection criteria. The reported coexistence between STICs and HGSOCs ranged from 11% to 61% (mean: 31%, 95% CI: 17-46%). STICs were rarely found in other gynaecological cancers. Small sample size, lack of objective criteria to identify STICs and the retrospective nature of the studies contributed to the variability in reporting the rate of the association.
STICs were identified commonly in the FTs of women with HGSOC. Finding the true rate of association between STICs and HGSOCs will require further investigations. While there is evidence that a fraction of HGSOCs arise from the FTs, an accurate estimate of that fraction remains to be determined. The lack of an accurate estimate of the association makes it difficult to evaluate the potential magnitude of reduction of HGSOCs following prophylactic salpingectomy.
A systematic review of the incidence of STICs in HGSOCs identifies significant methodological inconsistencies.
在高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)中已经证实存在输卵管上皮内癌(STIC)。然而,STIC 与 HGSOC 之间的关联率,以及因此,可能源自输卵管(FT)的 HGSOC 的比例仍然不清楚。
评估描述 STIC 与已确立的 HGSOC 之间关联的文献。
在 Ovid MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 上进行检索。
如果研究评估了 HGSOC 中 STIC 的频率,并在英文同行评审期刊上发表,则纳入研究。
评估适当的研究是否符合“观察性研究的强化和报告(STROBE)”标准。
符合研究选择标准的有 10 篇文章。报告的 STIC 与 HGSOC 共存率为 11%至 61%(平均值:31%,95%CI:17-46%)。STIC 在其他妇科癌症中很少见。小样本量、缺乏识别 STIC 的客观标准以及研究的回顾性性质导致报告关联率的变异性。
在 HGSOC 女性的 FT 中经常发现 STIC。要确定 STIC 与 HGSOC 之间的真实关联率,需要进一步调查。虽然有证据表明一部分 HGSOC 源自 FT,但确切的比例仍有待确定。由于缺乏对关联的准确估计,因此难以评估预防性输卵管切除术对 HGSOC 数量减少的潜在影响。
tweet 摘要:对 HGSOC 中 STIC 发生率的系统评价确定了存在显著的方法学不一致性。