Abudayyeh Islam, Takruri Yessar, Weiner Justin B
Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
OhioHealth Heart & Vascular Physicians, Gahanna, OH, USA.
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2016 Dec 23;4:2050313X16686017. doi: 10.1177/2050313X16686017. eCollection 2016.
A 66-year-old man underwent a placement of an inferior vena cava filter before a gastric surgery 9 years prior, presented to the emergency room with a complete atrioventricular block. Chest x-ray and transthoracic echocardiogram showed struts migrating to right ventricle with tricuspid regurgitation. Cardiothoracic surgery was consulted and declined an open surgical intervention due to the location of the embolized fragments and the patient's overall condition. It was also felt that the fragments had migrated chronically and were adhered to the cardiac structures.
The patient underwent a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker implantation. Post-implant fluoroscopy showed no displacement of the inferior vena cava filter struts due to the pacemaker leads indicating that the filter fracture had likely been a chronic process.
This case highlights a rare combination of complications related to inferior vena cava filter fractures and the importance of assessing for such fractures in chronic placements. Inferior vena cava filter placement for a duration greater than 1 month can be associated with filter fractures and strut migration which may lead to, although rare, serious or fatal complications such as complete atrioventricular conduction system disruption and valvular damage including significant tricuspid regurgitation.
Assessing for inferior vena cava filter fractures in chronic filter placement is important to avoid such complications. When possible, retrieval of the filter should be considered in all patients outside the acute setting in order to avoid filter-related complications. Filter retrieval rates remain low even when a retrievable filter is in place and the patient no longer has a contraindication to anticoagulation.
一名66岁男性在9年前的胃部手术前植入了下腔静脉滤器,现因完全性房室传导阻滞入住急诊室。胸部X线和经胸超声心动图显示滤器支柱迁移至右心室并伴有三尖瓣反流。咨询心胸外科后,因栓塞碎片的位置和患者的整体状况,拒绝了开放手术干预。还认为碎片已长期迁移并附着于心脏结构。
患者接受了双腔永久性起搏器植入术。植入后透视显示,由于起搏器导线,下腔静脉滤器支柱未发生移位,表明滤器骨折可能是一个慢性过程。
本病例突出了与下腔静脉滤器骨折相关的罕见并发症组合,以及在长期植入时评估此类骨折的重要性。下腔静脉滤器植入时间超过1个月可能与滤器骨折和支柱迁移有关,这可能导致(虽然罕见)严重或致命的并发症,如完全性房室传导系统中断和瓣膜损伤,包括严重的三尖瓣反流。
在长期滤器植入时评估下腔静脉滤器骨折对于避免此类并发症很重要。在可能的情况下,对于所有非急性情况下的患者都应考虑取出滤器,以避免与滤器相关的并发症。即使使用可回收滤器且患者不再有抗凝禁忌证,滤器回收率仍然很低。