胆管癌的局部区域治疗

Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma.

作者信息

Sommer Christof M, Kauczor Hans U, Pereira Philippe L

机构信息

Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany; Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany.

Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Heilbronn, Germany.

出版信息

Visc Med. 2016 Dec;32(6):414-420. doi: 10.1159/000453010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is the second most primary liver malignancy with increasing incidence in Western countries. Currently, surgical R0 resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment. The results of systemic chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC) in patients with metastatic disease are often disappointing in regard to toxicity, oncologic efficacy, and overall survival. In current practice, the use of different locoregional therapies is increasingly more accepted.

METHODS

A review of the literature on locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was undertaken.

RESULTS

There are no prospective randomized controlled trials. For localized ICC, either primary or recurrent, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most commonly used thermal ablation modality. Thereby, a systematic review and meta-analysis reports major complication in 3.8% as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 82, 47, and 24%, respectively. In selected patients (e.g. with a tumor diameter of ≤3 cm), oncologic efficacy and survival after RFA are comparable with surgical resection. For diffuse ICC, different transarterial therapies, either chemotherapy-based (hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) or radiotherapy-based (transarterial radioembolization (TARE)), show extremely promising results. With regard to controlled trials (transarterial therapy versus systemic chemotherapy, BSC or no treatment), tumor control is virtually always better for transarterial therapies and very often accompanied by a dramatic survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Of note, the latter is the case not only for patients without extrahepatic metastatic disease but also for those with liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. There are other locoregional therapies such as microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and chemosaturation; however, the current data support their use only in controlled trials or as last-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dedicated locoregional therapies are commonly used for primary and recurrent ICC as well as liver-only and liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. Currently, the best evidence and most promising results are available for RFA, HAI, TACE, and TARE. In cohort studies, the overall survival rates are similar to those obtained with surgery or systemic therapies. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare safety and efficacy between different surgical, interventional, and systemic therapies, as well as their combinations.

摘要

背景

胆管癌(CC)是第二大原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤,在西方国家发病率呈上升趋势。目前,手术R0切除被视为唯一可能治愈的治疗方法。对于转移性疾病患者,全身化疗和最佳支持治疗(BSC)在毒性、肿瘤疗效和总生存期方面的结果往往令人失望。在当前的实践中,不同局部区域治疗方法的应用越来越被接受。

方法

对肝内胆管癌(ICC)局部区域治疗的文献进行综述。

结果

尚无前瞻性随机对照试验。对于局限性ICC,无论是原发性还是复发性,射频消融(RFA)是目前最常用的热消融方式。因此,一项系统评价和荟萃分析报告主要并发症发生率为3.8%,1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为82%、47%和24%。在选定的患者(如肿瘤直径≤3 cm)中,RFA后的肿瘤疗效和生存率与手术切除相当。对于弥漫性ICC,不同的经动脉治疗,无论是基于化疗的(肝动脉灌注(HAI)、经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE))还是基于放疗的(经动脉放射性栓塞(TARE)),都显示出极具前景的结果。关于对照试验(经动脉治疗与全身化疗、BSC或不治疗),经动脉治疗的肿瘤控制几乎总是更好,而且常常伴随着显著的生存获益和生活质量的改善。值得注意的是,不仅没有肝外转移疾病的患者如此,肝外转移以肝脏为主的患者也是如此。还有其他局部区域治疗方法,如微波消融、不可逆电穿孔和化学饱和;然而,目前的数据仅支持它们在对照试验中使用或作为一线治疗。

结论

专门的局部区域治疗常用于原发性和复发性ICC以及仅肝脏转移和肝外转移以肝脏为主的疾病。目前,RFA、HAI、TACE和TARE有最佳证据和最有前景的结果。在队列研究中,总生存率与手术或全身治疗相似。有必要进行前瞻性随机对照试验,以比较不同手术、介入和全身治疗及其组合之间的安全性和疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索