Forti Lucas Rodriguez, Lingnau Rodrigo, Encarnação Lais Carvalho, Bertoluci Jaime, Toledo Luís Felipe
Laboratório Multiusuário de Bioacústica (LMBio) e Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0169911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169911. eCollection 2017.
Phenotypic traits, such as the frog advertisement call, are generally correlated with interspecific genetic variation, and, as a consequence of strong sexual selection, these behaviors may carry a phylogenetic signal. However, variation in acoustic traits is not always correlated with genetic differences between populations (intraspecific variation); phenotypic plasticity and environmental variables may explain part of such variation. For example, local processes can affect acoustic properties in different lineages due to differences in physical structure, climatic conditions, and biotic interactions, particularly when populations are isolated. However, acoustic traits can be used to test phylogenetic hypotheses. We analyzed the advertisement calls of Dendropsophus elegans males from 18 sites and compared them with those of four closely related congeneric species, in order to test for differences between inter and intraspecific variation. We analyzed 451 calls of 45 males of these five species. Because males from distant sites were grouped together without population congruence, differences found in advertisement calls among individuals were not correlated with phylogeographical clades. Phylogenetic and cluster analyses of the D. elegans clades and those of closely related species grouped all five species into the same topology, as reported by previous molecular and morphological phylogenies. However, the topology of the D. elegans phylogeographical clades did not match the topology previously reported. Acoustic communication in D. elegans seems to be conserved among populations, and the phylogeographical history of the species does not explain the variation among lineages in call properties, despite some congruent phylogenetic signals evident at the species level. Based on molecular clocks retrieved from the literature, it seems that more than 6.5 million years of divergence (late Miocene) are necessary to allow significant changes to occur in the acoustic properties of these treefrog calls, making it possible to recover their phylogenetic history only based on acoustic evidence.
表型特征,如蛙类的求偶鸣叫,通常与种间遗传变异相关,并且由于强烈的性选择,这些行为可能携带系统发育信号。然而,声学特征的变异并不总是与种群间的遗传差异(种内变异)相关;表型可塑性和环境变量可能解释了这种变异的一部分。例如,由于物理结构、气候条件和生物相互作用的差异,局部过程可能会影响不同谱系的声学特性,特别是当种群隔离时。然而,声学特征可用于检验系统发育假说。我们分析了来自18个地点的秀丽雨蛙(Dendropsophus elegans)雄性的求偶鸣叫,并将它们与四个密切相关的同属物种的鸣叫进行比较,以测试种间和种内变异之间的差异。我们分析了这五个物种的45只雄性的451次鸣叫。由于来自遥远地点的雄性被聚集在一起而没有种群一致性,因此在个体间求偶鸣叫中发现的差异与系统发育地理分支不相关。正如之前的分子和形态系统发育研究所报道的那样,秀丽雨蛙分支以及密切相关物种的系统发育和聚类分析将所有五个物种归为相同的拓扑结构。然而,秀丽雨蛙系统发育地理分支的拓扑结构与之前报道的拓扑结构不匹配。秀丽雨蛙的声学通讯在种群间似乎是保守的,尽管在物种水平上有一些明显一致的系统发育信号,但该物种的系统发育地理历史并不能解释鸣叫特性在谱系间的变异。根据从文献中获取的分子钟,似乎需要超过650万年的分歧时间(晚中新世)才能使这些树蛙鸣叫的声学特性发生显著变化,这使得仅基于声学证据来恢复它们的系统发育历史成为可能。