Roth Jonathan, Constantini Shlomi
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Mar;33(3):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3343-z. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Shunt disconnection (SD), or migration of the distal end to extra-peritoneal tissues, may lead to shunt malfunction or be diagnosed incidentally. We present a systematic approach for treatment options that is tailored to each patient's personalized history, CSF physiology, and distribution (MRI), as well as a careful informed consent process.
We present two algorithms, for symptomatic and asymptomatic SD. In cases presenting with symptomatic elevated intracranial pressure, a distal shunt revision (DSR), or, in selected patients, an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), should be performed. In asymptomatic patients, several options exist. The first decision is whether to intervene or follow. When action is recommended, a planned shunt revision is possible. The other option is to externalize the shunt and close it under careful clinical and radiological follow-up. Patients are then stratified to three main groups-those that are not shunt dependent, those that have radiological evidence of obstructed hydrocephalus, and the remaining patients. Patients are accordingly treated by ligation of the shunt without or with an endoscopic third ventriculostomy or with a distal shunt revision.
Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with a shunt disconnection. Seventeen were diagnosed at screening tests, while four were presented with shunt malfunction symptoms. Sixteen incidental cases were followed (3-111 months, 39 ± 37), of which three became symptomatic. One patient had an elective ETV followed by a DSR, and three followed-up patients became symptomatic and thus underwent surgery. All symptomatic patients underwent treatment (5 DSR, 2 ETV).
Shunt disconnection opens a window of opportunities into better understanding the pathophysiology of the hydrocephalic process in a specific patient. Distal shunt revision or ETV (in selected patients) is indicated in symptomatic cases. In asymptomatic patients, options exist. Choosing between those options mandates a careful individual assessment and a detailed informed consent process.
分流管断开(SD),即分流管远端迁移至腹膜外组织,可能导致分流功能障碍或被偶然诊断出来。我们提出一种针对治疗方案的系统方法,该方法根据每位患者的个性化病史、脑脊液生理学和分布情况(磁共振成像)进行调整,并采用谨慎的知情同意程序。
我们针对有症状和无症状的分流管断开情况提出了两种算法。对于出现颅内压症状性升高的病例,应进行远端分流管修复(DSR),或者在特定患者中进行内镜下第三脑室造瘘术(ETV)。对于无症状患者,有几种选择。首先要决定是进行干预还是进行观察。当建议采取行动时,可以进行计划性分流管修复。另一种选择是将分流管外置,并在仔细的临床和影像学随访下将其关闭。然后将患者分为三个主要组——不依赖分流管的患者、有梗阻性脑积水影像学证据的患者以及其余患者。相应地,通过结扎分流管(不进行或进行内镜下第三脑室造瘘术)或进行远端分流管修复来治疗患者。
21例患者被诊断为分流管断开。17例在筛查时被诊断出来,4例出现分流功能障碍症状。对16例偶然发现的病例进行了随访(3 - 111个月,平均39±37个月),其中3例出现症状。1例患者接受了择期内镜下第三脑室造瘘术,随后进行了远端分流管修复,3例接受随访的患者出现症状,因此接受了手术。所有有症状的患者均接受了治疗(5例进行远端分流管修复,2例进行内镜下第三脑室造瘘术)。
分流管断开为更好地理解特定患者脑积水过程的病理生理学提供了一个机会窗口。有症状的病例应进行远端分流管修复或内镜下第三脑室造瘘术(在特定患者中)。对于无症状患者存在多种选择。在这些选择之间做出决定需要进行仔细的个体评估和详细的知情同意程序。