Choong Ee Siang, Lo Serigne, Drummond Martin, Fogarty Gerald B, Menzies Alexander M, Guminski Alexander, Shivalingam Brindha, Clarke Kathryn, Long Georgina V, Hong Angela M
Chris O Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
With new systemic therapies demonstrating activity in melanoma brain metastasis, most of the previously reported stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) data are superseded. In this study, we report the outcomes (overall survival [OS] and brain control [BC]) and identify factors that associate with such outcomes in the era of modern systemic therapy.
A total of 108 patients treated with SRS from 2010 to 2015 were included. Systemic treatment use within 6 weeks of SRS was noted. OS was defined as time from SRS to death or last follow-up, and BC was defined as absence of any active intracranial disease during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed on clinico-pathological prognostic features associated with OS and BC.
The median age was 64.3 years, and the median follow-up was 8.6 months. Seventy-nine (73.1%) patients received systemic treatment. The median OS were as follows: anti-CTLA4 - 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.4-15.6), anti-PD1 - 20.4 months (95% CI: 8.8 - N/A) and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) ± MEK inhibitor (MEKi) - 17.8 months (95% CI: 11.8 - N/A). Median BC was as follows: anti-CTLA4 - 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.0-15.6), anti-PD1 - 12.7 months (95% CI: 5.5 - N/A) and BRAFi ± MEKi - 12.7 months (95% CI: 8.3-18.5). In multivariate analysis, age and type of systemic therapy were strongly associated with OS. Age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score, and presence of symptoms were associated with BC.
Favourable outcomes are seen in patients treated with SRS and with the best survival seen in patients treated with anti-PD1. Known independent prognostic factors for survival such as age and performance status and GPA score remain relevant in this setting.
随着新型全身治疗方法在黑色素瘤脑转移中显示出活性,大多数先前报道的立体定向放射外科(SRS)数据已被取代。在本研究中,我们报告了(总生存期[OS]和脑控制率[BC])的结果,并确定了在现代全身治疗时代与这些结果相关的因素。
纳入了2010年至2015年期间接受SRS治疗的108例患者。记录了SRS后6周内全身治疗的使用情况。OS定义为从SRS到死亡或最后一次随访的时间,BC定义为随访期间无任何活动性颅内疾病。对与OS和BC相关的临床病理预后特征进行单因素和多因素Cox比例风险分析。
中位年龄为64.3岁,中位随访时间为8.6个月。79例(73.1%)患者接受了全身治疗。中位OS如下:抗CTLA4治疗 - 7.5个月(95%CI:4.4 - 15.6),抗PD1治疗 - 20.4个月(95%CI:8.8 - 无可用数据),BRAF抑制剂(BRAFi)±MEK抑制剂(MEKi)治疗 - 17.8个月(95%CI:11.8 - 无可用数据)。中位BC如下:抗CTLA4治疗 - 7.5个月(95%CI:4.0 - 15.6),抗PD1治疗 - 12.7个月(95%CI:5.5 - 无可用数据),BRAFi±MEKi治疗 - 12.7个月(95%CI:8.3 - 18.5)。在多因素分析中,年龄和全身治疗类型与OS密切相关。年龄、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态、分级预后评估(GPA)评分和症状的存在与BC相关。
接受SRS治疗的患者预后良好,接受抗PD1治疗的患者生存期最佳。已知的生存独立预后因素,如年龄、体能状态和GPA评分,在这种情况下仍然相关。