Suppr超能文献

接受生物治疗的类风湿关节炎人群队列中的治疗方案转换:KOBIO注册研究结果

Switching profiles in a population-based cohort of rheumatoid arthritis receiving biologic therapy: results from the KOBIO registry.

作者信息

Park Dong-Jin, Choi Sung Jae, Shin Kichul, Kim Hyoun-Ah, Park Yong-Beom, Kang Seong Wook, Kwok Seung-Ki, Kim Seong-Kyu, Nam Eon Jeong, Sung Yoon-Kyoung, Lee Jaejoon, Lee Chang Hoon, Jeon Chan Hong, Lee Shin-Seok

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Hospital & Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, South Korea.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2017 May;36(5):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3584-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Abstract

Despite improved quality of care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, many still experience treatment failure with a biologic agent and eventually switch to another biologic agent. We investigated patterns of biologic treatment and reasons for switching biologics in patients with RA. Patients with RA who had started on a biologic agent or had switched to another biologic agent were identified from the prospective observational Korean nationwide Biologics (KOBIO) registry. The KOBIO registry contained 1184 patients with RA at the time of initiation or switching of biologic agents. Patients were categorized according to the chronological order of the introduction of biologic agents, and reasons for switching biologics were also evaluated. Of the 1184 patients with RA, 801 started with their first biologic agent, 228 were first-time switchers, and 89 were second-time or more switchers. Second-time or more switchers had lower rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP positivity, and higher disease activity scores at the time of enrollment than the other groups. Among these patients, tocilizumab was the most commonly prescribed biologic agent, followed by adalimumab and etanercept. The most common reason for switching biologics was inefficacy, followed by adverse events, including infusion reactions, infections, and skin eruptions. Furthermore, the proportion of inefficacy, as a reason for switching, was significantly higher with respect to switching between biologics with different mechanisms of action than between biologics with similar mechanisms. In this registry, we showed diverse prescribing patterns and differing baseline profiles based on the chronological order of biologic agents.

摘要

尽管类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的护理质量有所提高,但许多患者在使用生物制剂治疗时仍遭遇失败,最终转而使用另一种生物制剂。我们调查了RA患者的生物治疗模式及更换生物制剂的原因。从韩国全国性前瞻性观察生物制剂(KOBIO)登记处中识别出开始使用生物制剂或已更换为另一种生物制剂的RA患者。在开始使用或更换生物制剂时,KOBIO登记处中有1184例RA患者。根据生物制剂引入的时间顺序对患者进行分类,并评估更换生物制剂的原因。在1184例RA患者中,801例开始使用第一种生物制剂,228例是首次更换者,89例是第二次或更多次更换者。与其他组相比,第二次或更多次更换者在入组时类风湿因子和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性率较低,疾病活动评分较高。在这些患者中,托珠单抗是最常用的生物制剂,其次是阿达木单抗和依那西普。更换生物制剂最常见的原因是无效,其次是不良事件,包括输液反应、感染和皮疹。此外,作为更换原因的无效比例,在作用机制不同的生物制剂之间更换时显著高于作用机制相似的生物制剂之间。在这个登记处中,我们展示了基于生物制剂引入时间顺序的不同处方模式和不同的基线特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验