Sakrisvold Marthe Lefsaker, Granhag Pär Anders, Mac Giolla Erik
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Jan;35(1):75-90. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2275. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
How to discriminate between honest and deceptive alibi statements holds great legal importance. We examined this issue from the perspective of group deception. Our goals were to (a) compare the consistency between the statements of guilty and innocent suspects and those of their respective alibi witnesses, and (b) to examine the moderating role of object-salience on the level of consistency between their statements. Pairs of truth-tellers provided honest testimonies. Pairs of liars were divided into perpetrators and alibi witnesses. Statements of lying pairs were considerably more consistent than the statements of truth-telling pairs. In addition, both truth-tellers and liars showed lower levels of within-group consistency when recalling less salient details about an event. However, truth-tellers' consistency levels were considerably more affected by salience than were liars' consistency levels. These findings contribute to deception theory and have important implications for the real-life task of distinguishing between true and false alibi statements. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
如何区分真实和虚假的不在场证明陈述具有重大的法律意义。我们从群体欺骗的角度研究了这个问题。我们的目标是:(a)比较有罪和无罪嫌疑人与其各自不在场证明证人陈述之间的一致性;(b)检验客体显著性对他们陈述之间一致性水平的调节作用。成对的说实话者提供真实证词。成对的说谎者分为犯罪者和不在场证明证人。说谎对的陈述比说实话对的陈述一致性要高得多。此外,当回忆关于某一事件不太显著的细节时,说实话者和说谎者在群体内部的一致性水平都较低。然而,与说谎者的一致性水平相比,说实话者的一致性水平受显著性的影响要大得多。这些发现有助于欺骗理论的发展,对于区分真实和虚假不在场证明陈述的现实任务具有重要意义。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。