Wallner Jürgen, Reinbacher Knut, Feichtinger Matthias, Pau Mauro, Feigl Georg, Quehenberger Franz, Schwenzer-Zimmerer Katja, Zemann Wolfgang
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5/1, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5/1, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):526-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Fractures of the mandibular angle are a common type of facial skull fracture. Although operative treatment includes a wide range of fixation techniques, a definite gold standard method has yet to be established. Headless, cannulated Herbert screws, often used in many forms of minimally invasive trauma surgery, provide functional and stable fracture fixation.
In a prospective, double-randomised, controlled, parallel-group - designed, in vitro trial, the biomechanical behaviour of the Herbert bone screw system was compared to that of a conventional locking plate system in 40 mandibular angle fractures of human mandible cadaver phantoms.
The mean stress values were 250 (±68.0) N in the plate subgroup and 200 (±61.0) N in the screw subgroup. The respective mean strain values were 7.90 (±2.7) mm and 6.90 (±2.2) mm, and the respective mean stiffness were values 1.10 (±0.61) N/m and 0.78 (±0.40) N/m. The differences in the results obtained using the two treatments were not significant (p = 0.55).
The biomechanical behaviour of the two fixation systems within the tested loads did not significantly differ with respect to postoperative parameters clinically relevant in osteosynthesis. Both systems met the mandibular angle assessment criterion, which is considered to be sufficient for clinical use. The results indicate the potential clinical utility of these two systems, and recommend further testing.
下颌角骨折是颌面颅骨骨折的常见类型。尽管手术治疗包括多种固定技术,但尚未确立明确的金标准方法。无头空心Herbert螺钉常用于多种形式的微创创伤手术中,可提供功能性和稳定的骨折固定。
在一项前瞻性、双随机、对照、平行组设计的体外试验中,将Herbert接骨螺钉系统与传统锁定钢板系统在40例人类下颌骨尸体模型的下颌角骨折中的生物力学行为进行了比较。
钢板亚组的平均应力值为250(±68.0)N,螺钉亚组为200(±61.0)N。各自的平均应变值分别为7.90(±2.7)mm和6.90(±2.2)mm,各自的平均刚度值分别为1.10(±0.61)N/m和0.78(±0.40)N/m。两种治疗方法所得结果的差异不显著(p = 0.55)。
在测试负荷范围内,两种固定系统的生物力学行为在骨合成临床相关的术后参数方面没有显著差异。两种系统均符合下颌角评估标准,该标准被认为足以用于临床。结果表明这两种系统具有潜在的临床应用价值,并建议进一步测试。