Suppr超能文献

用于引产的充盈30毫升或60毫升的 Foley 导管:一项随机对照试验。

Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mL or 60mL: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Sandberg Evelien M, Schepers Evy M, Sitter Rosalie L van, Huisman Claartje M A, Wijngaarden Wim J van

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Gynaecology, Bronovo Hospital, Bronovolaan 5, 2597 AX The Hague, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

One of the methods used to induce labour is the placement of a transcervical Foley catheter (FC). The aim of this randomized controlled study was to assess in term pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix, whether there is a difference in efficacy between the two most commonly used insufflation volumes of FC (30mL and 60mL).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

Women were randomized to induction of labour with a Foley catheter filled with 30mL or with 60mL. Primary outcome was delivery within eight hours after amniotomy. Secondary outcomes included the time interval between placement of the Foley and amniotomy, the mode of delivery, complications and neonatal outcomes. In total, 174 women (87 in each arm) were randomized. The number of deliveries within eight hours after amniotomy was not significantly different between the two groups (40.7% versus 48.83%, OR=0.71(CI; 0.39-1.3)). Sub-analysis showed that more multiparous women in the 60mL group delivered within eight hours (93.10% versus 65.22%, OR=7.2 (CI; 1.35-38.37)). For the nulliparous, the 30mL Foley catheter was associated with a higher caesarean section rate (31.75% versus 15.52% (OR 2.53; CI; 1.1-6.2)). The 60mL Foley catheter was also associated with a higher chance of spontaneous labour after placement (OR 2.35; CI; 1.1-5.1), a shorter time interval for cervical ripening (OR=4.5; CI: 1.2-16.7) and less blood loss. (p=0.002). The Foley catheter ruptured twelve times in the 60mL group whereas this did not happen once in the 30mL group. One case of umbilical cord prolapse was observed in the 60mL group. No differences in neonatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

For our primary outcome, no difference was observed between the Foley catheter balloon filled with 60mL and the one filled with 30mL. Yet, a Foley catheter filled with 60mL was associated in multiparous women with a higher rate of deliveries within eight hours after amniotomy and in nulliparous with a significantly lower caesarean section rate. These latest findings should be interpreted with cautious as underpowered.

摘要

目的

诱导分娩的方法之一是放置经宫颈 Foley 导管(FC)。本随机对照研究的目的是评估宫颈条件不佳的足月孕妇中,FC 两种最常用的注入量(30mL 和 60mL)在疗效上是否存在差异。

研究设计

随机对照试验。

结果

将女性随机分为用 30mL 或 60mL 充盈的 Foley 导管诱导分娩。主要结局是破膜后八小时内分娩。次要结局包括放置 Foley 导管至破膜的时间间隔、分娩方式、并发症和新生儿结局。总共 174 名女性(每组 87 名)被随机分组。两组在破膜后八小时内的分娩数量无显著差异(40.7%对 48.83%,OR = 0.71(CI;0.39 - 1.3))。亚组分析显示 60mL 组更多经产妇在八小时内分娩(93.10%对 65.22%,OR = 7.2(CI;1.35 - 38.37))。对于初产妇,30mL 的 Foley 导管剖宫产率更高(31.75%对 15.52%(OR 2.53;CI;1.1 - 6.2))。60mL 的 Foley 导管放置后自然分娩的几率也更高(OR 2.35;CI;1.1 - 5.1),宫颈成熟的间隔时间更短(OR = 4.5;CI:1.2 - 16.7)且失血更少(p = 0.002)。60mL 组中 Foley 导管破裂 12 次,而 30mL 组一次都没发生。60mL 组观察到 1 例脐带脱垂。新生儿结局和患者满意度未见差异。

结论

对于我们的主要结局,60mL 充盈的 Foley 导管和 30mL 充盈的 Foley 导管之间未观察到差异。然而,60mL 充盈的 Foley 导管在经产妇中与破膜后八小时内更高的分娩率相关,在初产妇中剖宫产率显著更低。由于样本量不足功率低,这些最新发现应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验