Cáceres Pablo, San Martín René
Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Centro de Neuroeconomía, Universidad Diego Portales Santiago, Chile.
Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Centro de Neuroeconomía, Universidad Diego PortalesSantiago, Chile; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke UniversityDurham, NC, USA.
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 16;8:204. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00204. eCollection 2017.
Many advances have been made over the last decades in describing, on the one hand, the link between reward-based learning and decision-making, and on the other hand, the link between impulsivity and decision-making. However, the association between reward-based learning and impulsivity remains poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the association between individual differences in loss-minimizing and gain-maximizing behavior in a learning-based probabilistic decision-making task and individual differences in cognitive impulsivity. We found that low cognitive impulsivity was associated both with a better performance minimizing losses and maximizing gains during the task. These associations remained significant after controlling for mathematical skills and gender as potential confounders. We discuss potential mechanisms through which cognitive impulsivity might interact with reward-based learning and decision-making.
在过去几十年里,一方面在描述基于奖励的学习与决策之间的联系,另一方面在描述冲动性与决策之间的联系方面取得了许多进展。然而,基于奖励的学习与冲动性之间的关联仍然知之甚少。在本研究中,我们评估了在基于学习的概率决策任务中,损失最小化和收益最大化行为的个体差异与认知冲动性的个体差异之间的关联。我们发现,低认知冲动性与在任务中更好地实现损失最小化和收益最大化的表现相关。在将数学技能和性别作为潜在混杂因素进行控制后,这些关联仍然显著。我们讨论了认知冲动性可能与基于奖励的学习和决策相互作用的潜在机制。