Gillespie Erin F, Panjwani Neil, Golden Daniel W, Gunther Jillian, Chapman Tobias R, Brower Jeffrey V, Kosztyla Robert, Larson Grant, Neppala Pushpa, Moiseenko Vitali, Bykowski Julie, Sanghvi Parag, Murphy James D
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.050. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
The delivery of safe and effective radiation therapy relies on accurate target delineation, particularly in the era of highly conformal treatment techniques. Current contouring resources are fragmented and can be cumbersome to use. The present study reports on the efficacy and usability of a web-based contouring atlas compared with those of existing contouring resources in a randomized trial.
We enrolled radiation oncology residents into a 2-phase contouring study. All residents contoured a T1N1 nasopharyngeal cancer case using the currently available resources. The participants were then randomized to recontour the case with access to existing resources or an interactive web-based contouring atlas (eContour.org). Contour analysis was performed using conformation number and simultaneous truth and performance level estimation. At completion of the second contouring session, the residents completed a multiple choice question knowledge test and a 10-item System Usability Scale.
Twenty-four residents from 5 institutions completed the study. Compared with the residents using currently available resources, the residents using eContour had improved contour agreement with both the consensus (0.63 vs 0.52; P=.02) and the expert (0.58 vs 0.50; P=.01) contours for the high-risk clinical target volume and greater agreement with the expert contour for the contralateral parotid gland (0.44 ± 0.12 vs 0.56 ± 0.08; P=.003). The residents using eContour demonstrated greater knowledge of contour delineation and radiographic anatomy on a multiple-choice knowledge-based test (89% vs 77%; P=.03). Usability (89 vs 66; P<.0001) and satisfaction (4.1 vs 3.0; P=.002) were greater for eContour than for the existing resources.
This study demonstrates the capacity of an interactive 3-dimensional contouring atlas to improve quality of resident target delineation in radiation oncology. Further research is needed to define the utility of easily accessible interactive educational reference tool to improve adherence to contouring-based guidelines and quality of care in routine clinical practice.
安全有效的放射治疗的实施依赖于精确的靶区勾画,尤其是在高适形治疗技术的时代。当前的轮廓勾画资源分散,使用起来可能很繁琐。本研究在一项随机试验中报告了基于网络的轮廓勾画图谱与现有轮廓勾画资源相比的有效性和可用性。
我们将放射肿瘤学住院医师纳入一项两阶段的轮廓勾画研究。所有住院医师使用现有资源勾画一例T1N1鼻咽癌病例。然后将参与者随机分组,一组可使用现有资源重新勾画该病例,另一组可使用交互式网络轮廓勾画图谱(eContour.org)进行重新勾画。使用适形数以及同时真值和性能水平估计进行轮廓分析。在第二次轮廓勾画阶段结束时,住院医师完成了多项选择题知识测试和一份包含10个条目的系统可用性量表。
来自5个机构的24名住院医师完成了该研究。与使用现有资源的住院医师相比,使用eContour的住院医师在高危临床靶区体积方面与共识轮廓(0.63对0.52;P = 0.02)和专家轮廓(0.58对0.50;P = 0.01)的轮廓一致性更高,并且在对侧腮腺方面与专家轮廓的一致性更高(0.44 ± 0.12对0.56 ± 0.08;P = 0.003)。在基于多项选择题的知识测试中,使用eContour的住院医师在轮廓勾画和放射解剖学方面表现出更丰富的知识(89%对77%;P = 0.03)。eContour的可用性(89对66;P < 0.0001)和满意度(4.1对3.0;P = 0.002)均高于现有资源。
本研究证明了交互式三维轮廓勾画图谱在提高放射肿瘤学住院医师靶区勾画质量方面的能力。需要进一步研究来确定易于获取的交互式教育参考工具在改善日常临床实践中遵循基于轮廓勾画的指南和护理质量方面的效用。