Di Stefano Giulia, La Cesa Silvia, Leone Caterina, Pepe Alessia, Galosi Eleonora, Fiorelli Marco, Valeriani Massimiliano, Lacerenza Marco, Pergolini Mario, Biasiotta Antonella, Cruccu Giorgio, Truini Andrea
aDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy bDivision of Neurology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesú, IRCCS, Rome, Italy cCenter for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark dNeurology Unit, San Pio X Clinic, Fondazione Opera San Camillo, Milan, Italy eDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1100-1107. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000889.
Although the most widely agreed neurophysiological tool for investigating small fiber damage is laser-evoked potential (LEP) recording, no study has documented its diagnostic accuracy. In this clinical, neurophysiological, and skin biopsy study, we collected age-corrected LEP normative ranges, verified the association of LEPs with pinprick sensory disturbances in the typical diabetic mixed fiber polyneuropathy, and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of LEPs in diabetic small fiber neuropathy. From 288 LEP recordings from the face, hand, and foot in 73 healthy subjects, we collected age-corrected normative ranges for LEPs. We then selected 100 patients with mixed-fiber diabetic neuropathy and 25 patients with possible small-fiber diabetic neuropathy. In the 100 patients with mixed fiber neuropathy, we verified how LEP abnormalities were associated with clinically evident pinprick sensory disturbances. In the 25 patients with possible pure small fiber neuropathy, using the skin biopsy for assessing the intraepidermal nerve fiber density as a reference standard, we calculated LEP sensitivity and specificity. In healthy participants, age strongly influenced normative ranges for all LEP variables. By applying age-corrected normative ranges for LEPs, we found that LEPs were strongly associated with pinprick sensory disturbances. In relation to the skin biopsy findings, LEPs yielded 78% sensitivity and 81% specificity in the diagnosis of diabetic small fiber neuropathy. Our study, providing age-corrected normative ranges for the main LEP data and their diagnostic accuracy, helps to make LEPs more reliable as a clinical diagnostic tool, and proposes this technique as a less invasive alternative to skin biopsy for diagnosing diabetic small fiber neuropathy.
尽管用于研究小纤维损伤的最广泛认可的神经生理学工具是激光诱发电位(LEP)记录,但尚无研究记录其诊断准确性。在这项临床、神经生理学和皮肤活检研究中,我们收集了年龄校正后的LEP正常范围,验证了LEP与典型糖尿病混合性纤维多发性神经病中针刺感觉障碍的相关性,并评估了LEP在糖尿病小纤维神经病中的敏感性和特异性。从73名健康受试者面部、手部和足部的288次LEP记录中,我们收集了年龄校正后的LEP正常范围。然后,我们选择了100例混合性纤维糖尿病性神经病患者和25例可能患有小纤维糖尿病性神经病的患者。在100例混合性纤维神经病患者中,我们验证了LEP异常与临床上明显的针刺感觉障碍之间的相关性。在25例可能患有单纯小纤维神经病的患者中,以皮肤活检评估表皮内神经纤维密度作为参考标准,我们计算了LEP的敏感性和特异性。在健康参与者中,年龄对所有LEP变量的正常范围有很大影响。通过应用年龄校正后的LEP正常范围,我们发现LEP与针刺感觉障碍密切相关。与皮肤活检结果相关,LEP在糖尿病小纤维神经病诊断中的敏感性为78%,特异性为81%。我们的研究提供了主要LEP数据的年龄校正正常范围及其诊断准确性,有助于使LEP作为一种临床诊断工具更可靠,并提出该技术作为一种侵入性较小的替代方法用于诊断糖尿病小纤维神经病,以替代皮肤活检。