Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diabetology, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Sci China Life Sci. 2017 Mar;60(3):225-238. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-0409-7. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Despite the current guideline's recommendation of a timely stepwise intensification therapy, the "clinical inertia", termed as the delayed treatment intensification, commonly exists in the real world, which may be partly due to the relatively little substantial evidence and no clear consensus regarding the efficacy and safety of triple oral agents in patients inadequately controlled with dual therapy. In this clinical trial performed in 237 centers in China, 5,535 type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by previous therapies were treated with a stable metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy for 20 weeks. The patients who did not reach the glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goal were then further randomized into glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose group for an additional 24-week triple therapy. A mean HbA1c reduction of 0.85% was observed when sitagliptin was added to the patients inadequately controlled with metformin in 16 weeks. Further HbA1c reductions in the 24-week triple therapy stage were 0.65% in glimepiride group, 0.70% in gliclazide group, 0.61% in repaglinide group, and 0.45% in acarbose group. The non-inferiority criterion for primary hypotheses was met for gliclazide and repaglinide, but not for acarbose, compared with glimepiride, when added to metformin/sitagliptin dual therapy. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 29.2% in the dual therapy stage and 30.3% in the triple therapy stage. Metformin/sitagliptin as baseline therapy, with the addition of a third oral antihyperglycemic agent, including glimepiride, gliclazide, repaglinide, or acarbose, was effective, safe and well-tolerated for achieving an HbA1c <7.0% goal in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with previous therapies. The timely augmentation of up to three oral antihyperglycemic agents is valid and of important clinical benefit to prevent patients from exposure to unnecessarily prolonged hyperglycemia.
尽管目前的指南建议及时进行逐步强化治疗,但在现实世界中,经常存在“临床惰性”,即延迟治疗强化,这可能部分是由于相对较少的实质性证据,以及对于双重治疗控制不佳的患者,三联口服药物的疗效和安全性尚无明确共识。在这项在中国 237 个中心进行的临床试验中,5535 名以前治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者接受了稳定的二甲双胍/西格列汀双重治疗 20 周。未达到糖化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)目标的患者随后进一步随机分为格列美脲、格列齐特、瑞格列奈或阿卡波糖组,进行额外的 24 周三联治疗。当西格列汀加入到 16 周时二甲双胍控制不佳的患者中时,观察到 HbA1c 平均降低 0.85%。在 24 周的三联治疗阶段,格列美脲组 HbA1c 进一步降低 0.65%,格列齐特组降低 0.70%,瑞格列奈组降低 0.61%,阿卡波糖组降低 0.45%。与格列美脲相比,与二甲双胍/西格列汀双重治疗联合使用时,甘精胰岛素和瑞格列奈符合主要假设的非劣效性标准,但阿卡波糖不符合。双重治疗阶段的不良事件(AE)发生率为 29.2%,三联治疗阶段为 30.3%。以二甲双胍/西格列汀为基础治疗,加用第三种口服降糖药,包括格列美脲、格列齐特、瑞格列奈或阿卡波糖,对于以前治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者,有效、安全且耐受良好,可实现 HbA1c<7.0%的目标。及时增加至三种口服降糖药是有效的,对防止患者长期暴露于不必要的高血糖具有重要的临床意义。