Suppr超能文献

RNA提取方法对于人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7致癌基因的检测至关重要。

RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection.

作者信息

Fontecha Nerea, Nieto Maria Carmen, Andía Daniel, Cisterna Ramón, Basaras Miren

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Medicine and Odontology Faculty, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Sarriena auzoa, 48940, Leioa-Bizkaia, Spain.

Clinical Microbiology and Infection Control Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, 48013, Spain.

出版信息

Virol J. 2017 Mar 9;14(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0720-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plays a main role in the management of cervical cancer, however to improve the specificity in cervical screening, there is a need to develop and validate different approaches that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. Nowadays, mRNA expression of viral E6 and E7 HPV oncogenes stands up as a potential biomarker to improve cervical screening. We aimed to validate a method for RNA extraction, detect HPV mRNA expression and, assess the relationship between E6/E7 mRNA expression and pathology of patients' lesions and progression.

METHODS

This study included 50 specimens that had been previously genotyped as HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and/or 45. Cervical swabs were extracted with three different RNA extraction methods -Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux), High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) and RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen)-, and mRNA was detected with NucliSens EasyQ HPV version 1 test (bioMérieux) afterwards. Association of oncogene expression with pathology and lesion progression was analyzed for each extraction method.

RESULTS

E6/E7 mRNA positivity rate was higher in samples analyzed with bioMérieux (62%), followed by Roche (24%) and Qiagen (6%). Women with lesions and lesion progression showed a higher prevalence of viral RNA expression than women that had not lesions or with lesion persistence. While bioMérieux revealed a higher sensitivity (77.27%), Roche presented a higher PPV (75%) and an increased specificity (89.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraction methods based on magnetic beads provided better RNA yield than those based in columns. Both Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux) and High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) seemed to be adequate for E6/E7 mRNA detection. However, none of them revealed both high sensitivity and specificity values. Further studies are needed to obtain and validate a standard gold method for RNA expression detection, to be included as part of the routine cervical screening program.

摘要

背景

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测在宫颈癌管理中发挥着主要作用,然而,为了提高宫颈筛查的特异性,需要开发并验证不同的方法,以识别有疾病进展风险的女性。如今,病毒E6和E7 HPV致癌基因的mRNA表达作为一种潜在的生物标志物,有望改善宫颈筛查。我们旨在验证一种RNA提取方法,检测HPV mRNA表达,并评估E6/E7 mRNA表达与患者病变病理及进展之间的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了50份先前已基因分型为HPV16、18、31、33和/或45的样本。采用三种不同的RNA提取方法——Nuclisens手动提取试剂盒(生物梅里埃公司)、高纯病毒RNA试剂盒(罗氏公司)和RNeasy Plus Mini试剂盒(Qiagen公司)——提取宫颈拭子中的RNA,随后使用NucliSens EasyQ HPV 1.0检测试剂盒(生物梅里埃公司)检测mRNA。针对每种提取方法,分析致癌基因表达与病理及病变进展之间的关联。

结果

使用生物梅里埃公司方法分析的样本中E6/E7 mRNA阳性率更高(62%),其次是罗氏公司(24%)和Qiagen公司(6%)。有病变和病变进展的女性中病毒RNA表达的患病率高于无病变或病变持续的女性。虽然生物梅里埃公司的方法显示出更高的敏感性(77.27%),但罗氏公司的方法具有更高的阳性预测值(75%)和更高的特异性(89.28%)。

结论

基于磁珠的提取方法比基于柱式的方法能提供更好的RNA产量。Nuclisens手动提取试剂盒(生物梅里埃公司)和高纯病毒RNA试剂盒(罗氏公司)似乎都适用于E6/E7 mRNA检测。然而,它们均未显示出高敏感性和高特异性值。需要进一步研究以获得并验证一种用于RNA表达检测的标准金标准方法,将其纳入常规宫颈筛查项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e26f/5345170/095cda4ce131/12985_2017_720_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验