Wright David M, Rosato Michael, Raab Gillian, Dibben Chris, Boyle Paul, O'Reilly Dermot
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Derry, UK.
Health Place. 2017 May;45:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Religion frequently indicates membership of socio-ethnic groups with distinct health behaviours and mortality risk. Determining the extent to which interactions between groups contribute to variation in mortality is often challenging. We compared socio-economic status (SES) and mortality rates of Protestants and Catholics in Scotland and Northern Ireland, regions in which interactions between groups are profoundly different. Crucially, strong equality legislation has been in place for much longer and Catholics form a larger minority in Northern Ireland. Drawing linked Census returns and mortality records of 404,703 people from the Scottish and Northern Ireland Longitudinal Studies, we used Poisson regression to compare religious groups, estimating mortality rates and incidence rate ratios. We fitted age-adjusted and fully adjusted (for education, housing tenure, car access and social class) models. Catholics had lower SES than Protestants in both countries; the differential was larger in Scotland for education, housing tenure and car access but not social class. In Scotland, Catholics had increased age-adjusted mortality risk relative to Protestants but variation among groups was attenuated following adjustment for SES. Those reporting no religious affiliation were at similar mortality risk to Protestants. In Northern Ireland, there was no mortality differential between Catholics and Protestants either before or after adjustment. Men reporting no religious affiliation were at increased mortality risk but this differential was not evident among women. In Scotland, Catholics remained at greater socio-economic disadvantage relative to Protestants than in Northern Ireland and were also at a mortality disadvantage. This may be due to a lack of explicit equality legislation that has decreased inequality by religion in Northern Ireland during recent decades.
宗教常常表明其所属的社会族群具有独特的健康行为和死亡风险。确定不同群体之间的相互作用在多大程度上导致死亡率差异往往具有挑战性。我们比较了苏格兰和北爱尔兰新教徒和天主教徒的社会经济地位(SES)和死亡率,这两个地区不同群体之间的相互作用差异很大。至关重要的是,强有力的平等立法已经实施了更长时间,而且天主教徒在北爱尔兰占更大的少数群体。利用苏格兰和北爱尔兰纵向研究中404,703人的人口普查关联数据和死亡记录,我们使用泊松回归来比较宗教群体,估计死亡率和发病率比。我们拟合了年龄调整模型和完全调整模型(针对教育、住房保有情况、汽车拥有情况和社会阶层)。在这两个国家,天主教徒的社会经济地位都低于新教徒;在苏格兰,教育、住房保有情况和汽车拥有情况方面的差异更大,但社会阶层方面并非如此。在苏格兰,相对于新教徒,天主教徒的年龄调整后死亡风险增加,但在对社会经济地位进行调整后,群体间的差异有所减弱。那些报告无宗教信仰的人与新教徒的死亡风险相似。在北爱尔兰,天主教徒和新教徒在调整前后均无死亡率差异。报告无宗教信仰的男性死亡风险增加,但这种差异在女性中不明显。在苏格兰,相对于新教徒,天主教徒在社会经济方面仍比北爱尔兰的天主教徒处于更大的劣势,而且在死亡率方面也处于劣势。这可能是由于缺乏明确的平等立法,而近几十年来北爱尔兰通过宗教减少了不平等现象。